Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:30:11.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct Modeling of the Simultaneous Flow of Compressible Atomizing Gas Jets and a Weakly Compressible Liquid Intermetallic Stream During Gas Atomization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Mingming Tong
Affiliation:
[email protected], University College Dublin, Engineering & Materials Science Centre, Dublin, Ireland
David J. Browne
Affiliation:
[email protected], University College Dublin, Engineering & Materials Science Centre, Dublin, Ireland
Get access

Abstract

The authors have developed a new atomization model enabling direct numerical simulation of the simultaneous flow of compressible atomizing gas jets and a weakly compressible liquid metal stream. It has been used to simulate the atomization of a Ni-50wt.%Al melt stream by argon gas jets in a closed-coupled atomizer. The 2D simulation results show that the presence of the liquid intermetallic stream significantly influences the field variables, particularly the aspiration pressure. At the gas plenum pressure used, the gas nozzles are choked and hence the gas flow upstream of the tip of the liquid delivery tube is not influenced by the presence of the liquid intermetallic stream, whereas the downstream gas flow is affected. Significant differences between model predictions assuming either incompressible or compressible gas are reported. Besides the atomization of liquid intermetallic stream by argon gas, this unified atomization model is available for use to simulate a variety of different twin-fluid atomization processes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Raney, M.. Method of producing Finely Divided Nickel, US Patent 1628190, issued May 10, 1927.Google Scholar
2. Browne, D. J. and Hunt, J. D., Arch. Thermodynamics 24, 25 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Browne, D. J. and Hunt, J. D., Numer. Heat Transfer, Part B 45, 395 (2004).Google Scholar
4. Banaszek, J., Browne, D.J., Mater. Trans. 46, 1378 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Tong, M. and Browne, D. J., Commun. Numer. Meth. Engng. 24, 1171 (2008).Google Scholar
6. Tong, M. and Browne, D. J., Proc. International Symposium on Liquid Metal Processing and Casting, ed. Lee, Peter D., Mitchell, Alec, Bellot, Jean-Pierre and Jardy, Alain, Nancy, France, 2007, pp. 255260.Google Scholar
7. Tong, M. and Browne, D. J., Mater, J. . Processing Tech. 202, 419 (2008).Google Scholar
8. Fritsching, U. and Bauckhage, K., Comp, J. . Fluid Dynamics 5, 81 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Heck, U., Zur Zerstaubung in Freifalldusen. Dissertation, Universitat Bremen, 1998 Google Scholar
10. Ting, J. and Anderson, I. E., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 379, 264 (2004).Google Scholar
11. Xu, Q., Cheng, D., Trapaga, G., Yang, N. and Lavernia, E.J., J. Mater. Res. 17, 156 (2002).Google Scholar
12. Zeoli, N. and Gu, S., Comp. Mater. Sci. 43, 268 (2008).Google Scholar
13. Mi, J., Figliola, R.S. and Anderson, I.E., Metall. Mater. Trans. B 28, 935 (1997).Google Scholar
14. Espina, P. I., Study of an underexpanded annular wall jet past an axisymmetric backward-facing step, Ph.D thesis, 1997, University of Maryland Google Scholar
15. Espina, P. I. and Piomelli, U., Numerical simulation of the gas flow in gas-metal atomizers, Proceedings of the 1998 ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting (Washington, DC: ASME 1998), FEDSM98–4901, pp.111 Google Scholar
16. Tong, M. and Browne, D.J., Computers and Fluids, accepted for publication, November 2008.Google Scholar
17. Yabe, T. and Wang, P., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 60, 2105 (1991).Google Scholar
18. Yokoi, K. and Xiao, F., Physica D 161, 202 (2002).Google Scholar
19. Yoon, S.Y. and Yabe, T., Computer Physics Commun. 119, 149 (1999)Google Scholar
20. Ida, M., Computer Physics Commun. 150, 300 (2003).Google Scholar
21. Xiao, F., Akoh, R. and Ii, S., J. Comput. Phys. 213, 31 (2006).Google Scholar
22. Various Authors, First-Phase Report on Structure Characterisation Results for Turbine and Catalytic Materials, IMPRESS project, Deliverables D9–2 & D9–3, European Space Agency, 2006, pp. 9899.Google Scholar