Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:00:56.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct Approach to Atomistic Ab Initio Studies of Precipitate Growth in Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Flemming JH Ehlers  and
Randi Holmestad
Flemming JH Ehlers
Affiliation:
[email protected]@gmail.com, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Department of Physics, Trondheim, Norway
Randi Holmestad
Affiliation:
[email protected], Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Department of Physics, Trondheim, Norway
Get access

Abstract

A dramatic gain in the knowledge of precipitate formation, composition, and evolution in alloys has been achieved in the recent years with improvement of transmission electron microscopy techniques for direct structural imaging [1]. A detailed understanding of the microstructure is often essential for control and manipulation of materials properties: an important example for metals is the significant hardening of Al alloys by particular precipitates from a sequence strongly dependent on alloying element concentration and the treatment of the material [2]. The wealth of experimental information provides a playground for theory in the context of elucidating precipitate growth mechanisms and influence on the host material. A head-on approach to atomistic modelling of these phenomena using an ab initio based scheme is conventionally deemed highly desired but impractical. The basic argument is that the system of any reasonably sized (i.e. realistic) and well isolated microstructure will simply contain too many atoms. We will challenge this conventional view: it is argued that most of the atoms of the above mentioned system do not play an active role in the growth discussion, hence need not be included in the modelling. Subsequently, a model system is presented which offers a highly accurate description of the interface between the host lattice and a microstructure of an arbitrary size, for the case where this interface is coherent and compositionally abrupt. When used in conjunction with other approaches already available, this model system offers a direct approach to atomistic ab initio studies of microstructure growth. A general introduction to the modelling scheme will be presented, with the particular application being the main hardening precipitate β'' in the Al-Mg-Si alloy. [1] K. W. Urban, Nature Mater. 8, 260 (2009). [2] C. D. Marioara, S. J. Andersen, H. W. Zandbergen, and R. Holmestad, Metal. Mater. Trans. A 36A, 691 (2005).

Keywords

alloynanostructureAl
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1229: Symposium LL – Multiphysics Modeling in Materials Design , 2009 , 1229-LL02-09
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Polmear, I. J. in Light Alloys (4th edition): From Traditional Alloys to Nanocrystals, Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann (2005), pp. 53–61.Google Scholar
2 Urban, K. W. Nature Mater. 8, 260 (2009).Google Scholar
3 Goedecker, S. Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1085 (1999); F. R., Krajewski and M. Parrinello Phys. Rev. B 75, 235108 (2007).Google Scholar
4 Marioara, C. D. Andersen, S. J. Zandbergen, H. W. and Holmestad, R. Met. Mater. Trans. A 36A, 691 (2005).Google Scholar
5 Ehlers, F. J. H. and Holmestad, R. (in preparation)Google Scholar
6 Zandbergen, H. W. Andersen, S. J. and Jansen, J. Science 277, 1221 (1997); S. J., Andersen, H. W., Zandbergen, J., Jansen C. Træholt, U. Tundal and O., Reiso Acta Mater. 46, 3283 (1998).Google Scholar
7 Hasting, H. S. Frøseth, A. G., Andersen, S. J. Vissers, R. Walmsley, J. C. Marioara, C. D. Holmestad, R. Danoix, F. and Lefebvre, W. J. Appl. Phys. 106, 123527 (2009).Google Scholar
8 Hohenberg, P. and Kohn, W. Phys. Rev. 136, B 864 (1964); W. Kohn and L. J., Sham Phys. Rev. 140, A 1133 (1965).Google Scholar
9 Vanderbilt, D. Phys. Rev. B 32, 8412 (1985).Google Scholar
10 Kresse, G. and Hafner, J. Phys. Rev. B 47 R558 (1993); G. Kresse and J. Furthmuller, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).Google Scholar
11 Perdew, J. P. Chevary, J. A. Vosko, S. H. Jackson, K. A. Pederson, M. R. Singh, D. J. and Fiolhais, C. Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671 (1992).Google Scholar