Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:23:07.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diffusion Porosity and Diffusivity of Radionuclides In Granitic Rocks. Part I: Diffusion Interfaces Around Permeable Fractures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Veijo O. Pirhonen ,
K. Front  and
P. Pitkänen
Veijo O. Pirhonen
Affiliation:
Technical Research Centre of Finland, Geotechnical Laboratory, P.O. BOX 108, SF-02151 Espoo, Finland
K. Front
Affiliation:
Technical Research Centre of Finland, Geotechnical Laboratory, P.O. BOX 108, SF-02151 Espoo, Finland
P. Pitkänen
Affiliation:
Technical Research Centre of Finland, Geotechnical Laboratory, P.O. BOX 108, SF-02151 Espoo, Finland
Get access

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of evaluation of radionuclide retardation in fractured rocks. Pore space around permeable fractures was examined by means of the fracture profiling technique which comprises porosity measurements and chemical analyses along the profiles perpendicular to the fracture surfaces.

Scanning electron micrographs show that the examined interfaces contain microfractures and tube-like diffusion channels. These are most frequent within 2 - 4 cm from the surface of the examined fractures. Porosity and chemistry of these interfaces are fracture specific. It is possible that diffusion into the rock matrix is restricted into the interfaces around the permeable fractures.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 212: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV , 1990 , 649
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Carter, N.L., Anderson, D.A., Hansen, F.D. and Kranz, R.L., Creep and creep rupture of granitic rocks. Geoph. Monogr. 24, Am. Geoph. Union, 61–82 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Cramer, J. J. and Nesbitt, H. W., Mass balance relations and trace element mobility during continental weathering of various igneous rocks. Symp. Petrology of Weathering and Soils. Sciences Geologiques, Mem. 73, 63–73 (1983).Google Scholar
3. Gascoyne, M. and Cramer, J.J., History of actinide and minor element mobility in an Archean granitic batholith in Manitoba, Canada. Appl. Geochem., 2, 37–53 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Kumpulainen, H., Muurinen, A. and Uusheimo, K., Diffusivity and electrical resistivity measurements in matrix around fractures, MRS 1990 fall meeting (in this volume).Google Scholar
5. Melnyk, T.W. and Skeet, A.M.M., An improved technique for determination of rock porosity. Can. J. Earth Sci. 23, 1068–1074 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Montoto, M. and Durrance, E., Microstructure and state of radioactive equilibrium of crystalline rock in relation to retardation of radionuclides by diffusion into the rock matrix. Commision of the European Communities, Geological disposal of radioactive waste, RWD 90/1, 273–286 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Nesbitt, H.W., Mobility and fractionation of rare earth elements during weathering of a granodiorite. Nature 279 :17, 206–210 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Paterson, M.S., Experimental rock deformation: The brittle field. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978), p. 538.Google Scholar
9. Pirhonen, V., Pitkänen, P. and Front, K., Diffusion interfaces of fractures in granitic rocks. Nuclear Waste Commission of Finland, Report YJT-90–10, 26 + app. 37 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Simmons, G. and Richter, D., in Physics and chemistry of minerals and rocks, ed. by Strens, R.G.J. (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1976), pp. 105 – 137.Google Scholar
11. Turner, I., Methamorphic rocks (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976), p. 630.Google Scholar