Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:55:21.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of a Used Fuel Container for Nuclear Fuel Waste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Peter Maak*
Affiliation:
Ontario Power Generation, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. M3B 3J7
Get access

Abstract

The deep geologic repository (DGR) concept is one of the approaches being considered in Canada for long-term management of used CANDU fuel. The Canadian concept entails encapsulating used CANDU fuel bundles in durable used-fuel containers (UFCs) and burying the UFCs in an engineered repository at depth in the Canadian Shield. Currently, an updated concept for a DGR is being prepared by Ontario Power Generation (OPG).

This technical paper describes OPG's studies from 1999 to 2002 that have led to the development of an updated reference UFC design. The updated UFC design holds 324 used CANDU fuel bundles. It consists of an outer corrosion-resistant oxygen-free phosphorous-doped copper vessel and an inner load-bearing steel vessel. The used-fuel bundles are placed within a fuel basket for handling and loading into the UFC. This reference UFC design would be used for future safety assessment and engineering studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. AECL (Atomic Energy of Canada Limited), “Environmental impact statement of the concept for disposal of Canada's nuclear fuel waste”, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL 10711, COG-93–1. Chalk River, Ontario (1994).Google Scholar
2. Werme, L.O., “Design premises for canister for spent nuclear fuel”, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company Technical Report TR-98–08, Stockholm, Sweden. (1998).Google Scholar
3. Raiko, H. and Salo, J-PDesign report of the canister for nuclear fuel disposal”, POSIVA Report POSIVA-96–13, Posiva Oy, Helsinki, Finland (1996).Google Scholar
4. Maak, P., “The selection of a corrosion-barrier primary material for used-fuel disposal containers”, Ontario Power Generation, Nuclear Waste Management Division Report 06819-REP-01200–10020-R00. Toronto, Ontario (1999).Google Scholar
5. Johnson, L.H., LeNeveu, D.M., King, F., Shoesmith, D.W., Kolar, M., Oscarson, D.W., Sunder, S., Onofrei, C., and Crosthwaite, J.L., “The disposal of Canada's nuclear fuel waste: A study of in-room emplacement of used CANDU fuel in copper containers in permeable rock: Volume 2: vault model”, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report AECL 11494–2, COG-95–552–2. Chalk River, Ontario (1996).Google Scholar
6. Poon, G., Saiedfar, M., and Maak, P.., “Selection of a primary load-bearing component conceptual design for used-fuel containers”, Ontario Power Generation, Nuclear Waste Management Division Report 06819-REP-01200–10051-R00. Toronto, Ontario (2001).Google Scholar
7. Maak, P. and Simmons, G.R.. 2001. Summary report: A screening study of used-fuel container geometric designs and emplacement methods for a deep geologic repository. Ontario Power Generation, Nuclear Waste Management Division Report 06819-REP-01200–10065-R00. Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar