Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:15:10.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determining Yield Stress via Measurement of Nanoindentation Plastic Zone Radii

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. S. Robach
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455
D. E. Kramer
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455
W. W. Gerberich
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

Nanoindentation is a method of measuring the mechanical properties of materials that cannot be tested by conventional techniques. A method for determining yield stress from indentation has been developed by Huang and Gerberich based on Johnson's spherical cavity model. The method requires only a knowledge of the peak load and corresponding plastic zone radius to determine yield stress. This has previously been demonstrated for large scale indentations, but not for nanoindentation where assumptions such as isotropy and homogeneity may no longer be valid. Nanoindentation experiments have been performed on a series of cold rolled and annealed OFHC copper samples. Different annealing temperatures resulted in a range of initial yield stresses which were measured by conventional tensile testing. Electropolished samples were then tested using the Hysitron Triboscope (an add-on device to an atomic force microscope) which allowed for collection of both indentation and image information from which load and plastic zone radius could be measured. Comparison of yield stress measurements taken from nanoindentation and tensile tests shows an agreement to within 10% for initial yield stresses as low as 190 MPa and as high as 360 Mpa.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. ASTM Standard E384-89(1997)e1, Microhardness of Materials.Google Scholar
2. Doerner, M. F. and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M, J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Hoehn, J. W., Venkataraman, S. K., Huang, H., Gerberich, W. W., Mater. Sci. Eng. A192/193, 301 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Johnson, K. L., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 18, 115 (1970).Google Scholar
6. Bahr, D. F. and Gerberich, W. W., Met. Trans. A 27A, 1 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Dugdale, D. S., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2, 265 (1954).Google Scholar
8. Samuels, L. E. and Mullhearn, T. O., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 5, 125 (1957).Google Scholar
9. Harvey, S., Huang, H., Venkataraman, S., Gerberich, W. W., J. Mater. Res. 8, (1291) (1993)Google Scholar
10. ASTM Standard E8-85a, Tension Testing of Metallic MaterialsGoogle Scholar
11. Tabor, D., Hardness of Metals, (Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1951).Google Scholar