Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:47:30.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of Phase Diagrams by AEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Raghavan Ayer*
Affiliation:
Exxon Research and Engineering CompanyRoute 22 East, Annandale, NJ 08801
Get access

Abstract

Determination of phase diagrams to understand the equilibria among phases in metallic and ceramic systems has been of paramount interest in many areas of materials research. Traditionally, phase diagrams have been determined by (i) selecting several experimental compositions to map the region in the system of interest, (ii) exposing the alloys to temperature to achieve equilibrium, and (iii) characterizing one or more of the physical properties of the bulk material such as the crystal structure(s), magnetic property, metallography, etc., to determine the number and type of phases present in each alloy. Phase boundaries are then determined by delineating the regions of alloy compositions with respect to the number and types of phases present. The traditional methods suffer from several drawbacks, the major ones being (i) the need for numerous samples, (ii) difficulties in accurately determining multi-phase regions, (iii) assumption that the bulk samples are macroscopically and microscopically homogeneous, and (iv) difficulties in establishing the attainment of equilibrium. The limitations of these traditional methods mainly stem from their inherent inability to characterize the crystal structure and composition of the individual phasesCI). More recently, methods have been developed to determine phase boundaries by x-ray microprobe analysis of bulk diffusion couples (2). Though this approach offers some advantages over the conventional methods, it is still limited by the poor spatial resolution of x-ray microprobe analysis.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Raghavan, M., Mueller, R. R., Vaughn, G. A., and Floreen, S., Met. Trans. vol.15A, 1984, p. 783.Google Scholar
2. Haseke, M. and Nishizawa, T., ”Applications of Phase Diagrams in Metallurgy and Ceramics”, vol.2, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, 1977, p. 911.Google Scholar
3. Williams, D. B., Philips Electronic Instruments, 85 McKee Drive, Mahway, NJ 07430, 1984.Google Scholar
4. Zaluzec, N. J.. EMSA Bulletin, ed. Anderson, R., vol.14, No. 1, 1984, pp. 6775; vol.13, No. 2, 1985, pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
5. Goldstein, J. I. and Williams, D. B., SEM, vol.1, 1978, pp. 427–34.Google Scholar
6. Zaluzec, N. J., Introduction to Analytical Electron Microscopy, ed. Joy, D. C., Hren, J. J. and Goldstein, J. I., Plenum Press, New York 1979, p.Google Scholar
7. Raghavan, M., Mueller, R. R. and Klein, C. F., Scripta Metallurgica, vol.17, 1983, p. 1189.Google Scholar
8. Romig, A. and Goldstein, J. I., Metall. Trans. A., 1980, vol.11A, p. 1151.Google Scholar
9. Ayer, R., Mueller, R. R. and Klein, C. F., ”Analytical Electron Microscopy, eds. Williams, D. B. and Joy, D. C., San Francisco Press, Box 6800, San Francisco, CA 94101, 1984, p. 170.Google Scholar