Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:04:26.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of Elastic Modulus and Yield Stress of Ultra-thin Cu and low-k Films Using Spherical Nanoindentation Measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Satoshi Shimizu
Affiliation:
Research Department, NISSAN ARC, LTD., 1 Natushima-cho, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
Nobuo Kojima
Affiliation:
Research Department, NISSAN ARC, LTD., 1 Natushima-cho, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
Jiping Ye
Affiliation:
Research Department, NISSAN ARC, LTD., 1 Natushima-cho, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
Get access

Abstract

A spherical nanoindentation method was developed to evaluate elastic and plastic deformation parameters. The experimental reliability was confirmed by examining fused silica in the elastic deformation range. Yield stress as a quantitative plastic parameter was estimated using the Hertz contact theory and Tresca yield criterion. A copper thin film and two types of low-k thin film were examined. Reduced modulus was almost the same as the value obtained for the Cu (100) plane and yield stress was found to be between single crystals Cu (111) and Cu (100). These mechanical properties were thought to be dependent on the crystal orientation of the copper thin film. The two types of MSQ low-k film exhibited a difference in yield stress, although hardness was estimated to be similar by using the conventional nanoindentation method. These results have never been seen on a micro-mater scale.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mater.Res., 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V., J. Mater. Res., 8, 297 (1993)Google Scholar
3. Hay, J.L. and Wolff, P.J., J. Mater. Res., 16, 1280 (2001)Google Scholar
4. Ye, Jiping, Kano, Makoto and Yasuda, Yoshiteru, Tribology Letters, 13, 41 (2002).Google Scholar
5. Hretz, H., Reine, J. Angew. Math. 92, 156 (1881).Google Scholar
6. Thimoshenco, S.P. and Goodier, J.N., “Theory of Elasticity, 3rd edition” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970)Google Scholar
7. Tabor, D., Hardness of Metals (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1951).Google Scholar