Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:26:07.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Derivation of a Waste Package Source Term for NNWSI from the Results of Laboratory Experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Virginia M. Oversby  and
Charles N. Wilson
Virginia M. Oversby
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94550
Charles N. Wilson
Affiliation:
Westinghouse Hanford Company, P.O. Box 1970, Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

Results are presented for the dissolution of Turkey Point pressurized water reactor (PWR) spent fuel in J-13 well water at ambient hot cell temperatures. These results are compared with those previously obtained on Turkey Point fuel in deionized water, on H. B. Robinson PWR fuel in J-13 water, and by other workers using various fuels in dilute bicarbonate groundwaters. A model is presented that represents the conditions under which maximum dissolution of spent fuel could occur in a repository sited at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Using an experimentally determined upper limit of 5 mg/l for uranium solubility in J-13 water, a fractional release rate of 6.4 × 10−8 per year is obtained by assuming that all water entering the repository carries away the maximum amount of uranium.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 50: Symposium STOCKHOLM – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX , 1985 , 337
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sinnock, S., Lin, Y. T., and Brannen, J. P., SAND84-1492, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (1984).Google Scholar
2. Wilson, C. N., HEDL-TC-2353-3, Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, Richland, WA (1984).Google Scholar
3. Wilson, C. N., HEDL-TME-84-30, Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, Richland, WA (1985).Google Scholar
4. Oversby, V. M., UCRL-53629, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA (1985).Google Scholar
5. Wilson, C. N., and Oversby, V. M., UCRL-91464, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA (1985).Google Scholar
6. Johnson, L. H., Burns, K. I., Joling, H., and C, Moore, J., Nucl. Technol 63, 470 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Forsyth, R. S., Svanberg, K., and Werme, L., in Proceedings of the Third Spent Fuel Workshop, Werme, L. editor, KBS Technical Report No. 83-76, Swedish Nuclear Fuel Supply Co., 1983 (issued March 1984).Google Scholar
8. Oversby, V. M., and McCright, R. D., UCRL-91257, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA (1984).Google Scholar
9. Montazer, P., and Wilson, W. E., USGS-WRI-84-4345, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations, Lakewood, CO (1984).Google Scholar
10. Johnson, L. H., AECL-6837, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada (1982).Google Scholar
11. Fernandez, J. A., and Freshley, M. D., SAND83-1778, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (1984).Google Scholar
12. Van Konynenburg, R. A., Smith, C. F., Culham, H. W., and Otto, C. H. Jr., UCRL-90855, Rev. 1, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA (1984).Google Scholar
13. Code of Federal Regulations, IOCFR60, Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 60 (June 30, 1983).Google Scholar
14. Alexander, C. W. et al., ORNL/TM-6008, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN (October, 1977).Google Scholar