Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:48:04.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Depth Profiling of Oxygen Vacancy Defect Generation in Buried SiO2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

A. Stesmans  and
K. Vanheusden
A. Stesmans
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
K. Vanheusden
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Get access

Abstract

Oxygen-vacancy defects (E') generated at the surface of buried SiO2 layers formed by O+ implantation during the separation by implantation of oxygen (SIMOX) process have been studied by electron spin resonance (ESR) at 4.2 K. The E' damage was generated during exposure to a dc Ar glow discharge that produces defects predominantly in a surface layer of ≈100 Å thick, reaching local volume densities at the surface up to 8 × 1019 cm−3. This glow discharge exposure, alternated with step-by-step etch back, allowed mapping of a defect generation sensitivity depth profile of the buried oxide (BOX) layer, revealing a fairly uniform sensitivity with a strong decline towards the BOX/substrate interface. Besides the usual E' γ signal, the E'δj center — a delocalized variant of the E' center — has been newly observed in the BOX. Reoxidation of the BOX was observed to reduce the E' sensitivity close to that of regular dry thermal oxide (≥ 29 times lower), while the E'γ signal could no longer be generated, again similar to conventional thermal oxide. These data suggest a revision of the model for the E' defect. In general, the results strongly suggest that the buried oxide contains excess Si, exceedingly so near the BOX/substrate interface.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 284: Symposium G – Amorphous Insulating Thin Films , 1992 , 299
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Brown, G. A. and Revesz, A. G., Abstracts Electrochem. Soc. Meeting, St. Louis (1992).Google Scholar
2. Brady, F., Li, S., and Krull, W., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 6143 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Boesch, H., Taylor, T., and Brown, G., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 38, 1234 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Zvanut, M., Stahlbush, R., Carlos, W., Hughes, H., Lawrence, R., Hevey, R., and Brown, G., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 38, 1253 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Stesmans, A. and Vanheusden, K., to be published in J. Appl. Phys. (1992).Google Scholar
6. Devine, R. A. B., Leray, J-L., and Margail, L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 2275 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Conley, F. F., Lenahan, P. M., and Roitman, P., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 38, 1247 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Stahlbush, R. E., Carlos, W. E., and Prokes, J. M., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 34, 1680 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Weeks, R. A., J. Appl. Phys. 27, 1376 (1956).Google Scholar
10. Stesmans, A., J. Magn. Reson. 76, 14 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Vanheusden, K. and Stesmans, A., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 6656 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Griscom, D. L. and Friebele, E. J., Phys. Rev. B 34, 7524 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Tohmon, R., Shimogaichi, Y., Tsuta, Y., Menukuni, S., Ohki, Y., Hama, Y., and Nagasawa, K., Phys. Rev. B 41, 7258 (1990).Google Scholar
14. Vanheusden, K. and Stesmans, A., to be published in Appl. Phys. Lett. (1993).Google Scholar
15. See, e.g., Griscom, D. L., Glass. Sci. Technol. 4B, 151 (1990).Google Scholar