Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T02:28:59.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Demonstration of Dose Modeling at Yucca Mountain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

Terri B. Miley
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
Paul W. Eslinger
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency is currently revising the regulatory guidance for high-level nuclear waste disposal. In its draft form, the guidelines contain dose limits. Since this is likely to be the case in the final regulations, it is essential that the U.S. Department of Energy be prepared to calculate site-specific doses for any potential repository location. This year, Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) has made a first attempt to estimate doses for the potential geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada as part of a preliminary total-systems performance assessment.

A set of transport scenarios was defined to assess the cumulative release of radionuclides over 10,000 years under undisturbed and disturbed conditions at Yucca Mountain. Dose estimates were provided for several of the transport scenarios modeled. The exposure scenarios used to estimate dose in this total-systems exercise should not, however, be considered a definitive set of scenarios for determining the risk of the potential repository.

Exposure scenarios were defined for waterborne and surface contamination that result from both undisturbed and disturbed performance of the potential repository. The exposure scenarios used for this analysis were designed for the Hanford Site in Washington. The undisturbed performance scenarios for which exposures were modeled are gas-phase release of 14C to the surface and natural breakdown of the waste containers with waterborne release. The disturbed performance scenario for which doses were estimated is exploratory drilling. Both surface and waterborne contamination were considered for the drilling intrusion scenario.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. ESLINGER, P.W., et al. , “Preliminary Total-System Analysis of a potential High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository at Yucca Mountain,” PNL-8444, PNL (1993).Google Scholar
2. BARNARD, R.W., et al. , “TSPA 1991: An Initial Total-System Performance Assessment for Yucca Mountain,” SAND-2795, Sandia National Laboratories (1992).Google Scholar
3.U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, “Environmental Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes, Final Rule,” 40 CFR Part 191, Federal Register, Vol. 50, pp. 3800638089. (1985).Google Scholar
4. “FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT: Disposal of Hanford Defense High- Level, Transuranic and Tank Wastes, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington,” DOE/EIS-0113, U. S. Department of Energy (1987).Google Scholar
5. NAPIER, B. A., PELOQUIN, R. A., STRENGE, D. L, and RAMSDELL, J. V., “Hanford Environmental Dosimetry Upgrade Project. GENII - The Hanford Environmental Radiation Dosimetry Software System. Volume 1: Conceptual Representation,” PNL-6584, PNL (1988).Google Scholar
6. International Commission on Radiological Protection, “Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.” ICRP Pub. 26, Pergamon Press, New York (1977).Google Scholar
7. “SITE CHARACTERIZATION PLAN: Yucca Mountain Site, Nevada Research and Development Area, Nevada,” DOEIRW-0199, U. S. Department of Energy (1988).Google Scholar