Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:05:24.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deformation Behavior of An O + β0 Processed Ti-21 Ai-23Nb Alloy at High Temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Venkat Seetharaman
Venkat Seetharaman*
Affiliation:
Materials and Processes Division, UES, Inc., Dayton, OH 45432
Get access

Abstract

A hot workability study was conducted on an orthorhombic Ti-21AI-23Nb alloy using isothermal, constant velocity compression tests, over the temperature range 900–1155°C and nominal strain rate range 0.001 to 1.0 s−1. Three different microstructures corresponding to (a) hot rolled and mill annealed, (b) β0 -heat treated, and (c) β0 solution treated and direct aged conditions were examined. These microstructures varied from a relatively coarse distribution of O-phase precipitates in a matrix of transformed βO to the metastable retained βO. Flow stress displayed a sharp dependence on temperature, strain rate and on the initial structure. While uniform plastic flow was obtained at high temperatures and for structures containing primary O, βO-heat treated structures led to pronounced flow softening. Strong yield point phenomena and serrated flow were observed in selected test conditions and for microstructures containing high volume fractions of metastable βO. These flow instabilities resulting from Luder band propagation and dynamic strain aging are interpreted in terms of dislocation interactions in supersaturated βO.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 364: Symposium L – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys–VI , 1994 , 1253
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rowe, R. G., in High Temperature Aluminides and Intermetallics, edited by Liu, C. T., Whang, S.H., Pope, D.P., and Stiegler, J.O. (TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1990), pp. 375–401.Google Scholar
2. Rowe, R. G., in Microstructure/Property Relationships in Titanium Aluminides and Alloys, edited by Kim, Y-W. and Boyer, R. R. (TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1991), pp.387–398.Google Scholar
3. Rowe, R. G., in Titanium ‘92: Science and Technology, edited by Froes, F. H., and Caplan, I. (TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1993), pp. 343–350.Google Scholar
4. Graves, J. A., Smith, P. R., and Rhodes, C. G., in Intermetallic Matrix Composites II, edited by Miracle, D. B. et al. (Mater. Res. Soc, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
5. Smith, P. R., Graves, J. A. and Rhodes, C. G., Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 25A, 1267(1994).Google Scholar
6. Rowe, R. G., Banerjee, D., Muraleedharan, K., Larsen, M., Hall, E. L., Konitzer, D. G., and Woodfield, P., in Titanium ‘92: Science and Technology, edited by Froes, F. H. and Caplan, I., (TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1992), pp. 1259–66.Google Scholar
7. Kattner, U. R. and Boettinger, W. J., Mater. Sci. Eng., A152, 9 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Rhodes, C. G., Graves, J. A., Smith, P. R., and James, M. R., in Structural Intermetallics. edited by Darolia, R. et al., (TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1993), pp. 45–52; D.Banerjee, A.K.Gogia, T.K. Nandy, K.Muraleedharan, and R.S. Mishra, (TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1993), pp.19–33.Google Scholar
9. Muraleedharan, K., Gogia, A. K., Nandy, T. K., Banerjee, D. and Lele, S., Metall. Trans., A, 23A, 417(1992).Google Scholar
10. Bendersky, L. A., Scripta Metall. Mater., 29, 1645 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Bendersky, L. A., Boettinger, W. J., and Roytburd, A., Acta Metall., 39, 1959 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Semiatin, S. L. and Smith, P. R., Unpublished Research, 1993.Google Scholar
13. Kocks, U. F., Prog. Mater. Sci., Chalmers Anniversary Volume, 185 (1981).Google Scholar