Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:27:23.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Curricula For A Sustainable Future: A proposal for integrating environmental concepts into our curricula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Linda Vanasupa  and
Frank G. Splitt
Linda Vanasupa
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, [email protected]
Frank G. Splitt
Affiliation:
McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The global scientific community recognizes the critical need for industries to develop and practice manufacturing techniques that minimize harm to our environment. In the National Science Board's report Environmental Science and Engineering for the 21st Century, the National Science Foundation was urged to promote “Environmental research, education, and scientific assessment [as] one of NSF's higher priorities.” Although there are a number of independent efforts to fold environmental issues in existing undergraduate curricula, no dominant method has emerged as a means of including these concepts. One of the difficulties in adjusting our materials science and engineering (MSE) curricula is the problem of how and what to include in an already full curriculum. In this paper, we propose a path for integrating environmental and sustainability concepts within the framework of existing curricula. We will suggest learning outcomes for each year of the MSE curriculum and offer examples.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 827: Symposium BB – Educating Tomorrow's materials Scientists & Engineers , 2004 , BB4.5
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Hennesy, J., President, Stanford University, in “Pulling Together to Save the Planet,” Stanford, March/April 2004, p. 6.Google Scholar
[2] Crofton, F.S., “Education for sustainability: opportunities in undergraduate engineering,” J. Cleaner Production, 8 (2002) 397–405.Google Scholar
[3]Department of Trade and Industry, “The Engineer of the 21st Century Inquiry: Engineers for Sustainability,” Forum for the Future, available at http://www.forumforthefuture.org.uk/publications/default.asp, 2000.Google Scholar
[4] Newhouse, N., “Implications of Attitude and Behavior from Global and Specific Environmental Attitudes and Changes in Recycling Opportunities,” J. Applied Social Psychology, 22 (1992) 26–36.Google Scholar
[5] Vandenburg, W.H., “On the Measurement and Integration of Sustainability in Engineering Education,” J. Engineering Education, 89 (1999) 231–235.Google Scholar
[6] Anastas, P. T. and Zimmerman, J., Design Through the 12 Principles of Green Engineering. Environmental Science and Technology, 37 (5): 94A–101A, (2003).Google Scholar
[7] Hyde, R. A. and Karney, B.W., “Environmental Education Research: Implications for Engineering Education,” J. Engineering Education, 91 (2001) 267–275.Google Scholar
[8] “Engineers' Creed,” National Society of Professional Engineers Code of Ethics, National Society of Professional Engineers, adopted 1954 (http://www.nspe.org/ethics/eh1- cred.asp).Google Scholar
[9] Wackernagel, M. et al. , “Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy,” PNAS, 99 (2002) 9266–9271.Google Scholar
[10] White, E., Johnston, A., Brookes, F., and Buckland, H. “Communicating For Sustainability: Guidance For Higher Education Institutions,” Higher Education Partnership for Sustainability, Forum for the Future, London, UK (2004) p. 11.Google Scholar
[11] Puckett, J., Byster, L., Westervelt, S., Gutierrez, R., Davis, S., Hussain, A. and Dutta, M. Exporting Harm: The High-Tech Trashing of Asia, The Basel Action Network and Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (2004) p. 3. (available at www.svtc.org/cleancc/pubs/technotrash.html)Google Scholar
[12] See, for example, information on current conditions and air quality provided at www.epa.gov/airnow.Google Scholar
[13] Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2000, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Atmospheric Programs, EPA 430-R-02-003, April 2002.Google Scholar
[14] Halada, K., “Progress of ecomaterials toward a sustainable society,” Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, 7 (2003) 209–216.Google Scholar
[15] Jones, G., “World oil and gas ‘running out’,” CNN.com, October 2, 2003, (http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/10/02/global.warming/).Google Scholar
[16] For an introduction to Ecological Footprinting, go to www.redefiningprogress.org. The site also contains self-tests for individuals to determine their own ecological footprint.Google Scholar
[17] McDonough, W. and Braungart, M., Cradle To Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, North Point Press, New York, New York (2002).Google Scholar
[18] Merkel, J., Radical Simplicity: small footprints on a finite Earth, New Society Publishers, Canada (2003).Google Scholar
[19] Fava, J.A., Denison, R., Jones, B., Curran, M.A., Vigon, B., Selke, S. and Barnum, J., Editors A Technical Framework for Life-Cycle Assessments, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry and SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education, Inc., Washington, DC (1991).Google Scholar
[20] PRe[combiningacuteaccent] Consultants, The Netherlands, www.pre.nl.Google Scholar
[21] Consulting, PE, Group, www.GaBi-Software.comGoogle Scholar
[22] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, http://epa.gov/ORD/NRMRL/std/sab/iam_traci.htm.Google Scholar
[23] McDonough, W., Braungart, M., Anastas, P. T., and Zimmerman, J. B., Applying the Principles of Green Engineering to Cradle-to-Cradle Design. Environmental Science and Technology, 37 (23): 434A–441A (2003).Google Scholar