Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:03:00.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current Transport Mechanisms for MSM-Photodetectors on ZnO:N Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Tingfang Yen ,
Alan Haungs ,
Sung Jin Kim ,
Alexander Cartwright  and
Wayne A. Anderson
Tingfang Yen
Affiliation:
[email protected], University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Electrical Engineering, Buffalo, New York, United States
Alan Haungs
Affiliation:
[email protected], University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Electrical Engineering, Buffalo, New York, United States
Sung Jin Kim
Affiliation:
[email protected], University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Electrical Engineering, Buffalo, New York, United States
Alexander Cartwright
Affiliation:
[email protected], University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Electrical Engineering, Buffalo, New York, United States
Wayne A. Anderson
Affiliation:
[email protected], University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Electrical Engineering, Buffalo, New York, United States
Get access

Abstract

Metal-semiconductor-metal photodetectors (MSM-PDs) on ZnO:N thin films deposited by radiofrequency (RF) sputtering and with post N+ ion implantation processing were fabricated using a ZnO/Si structure. A 10 times reduction in dark current was observed compared to the devices on an as-deposited ZnO thin film without ion implantation. These MSM-PDs gave performances of a photo-to-dark current ratio of 2030 and responsivity (R) = 2.7 A/W; the pulse response was a 12.3 ns rise time and 15.1 ns fall time using a femto-second pulse. Temperature-dependent current -voltage (I-V-T) characteristics of the MSM-PDs were observed and the space charge limited current (SCLC) theory was applied to determine the current transport mechanisms. In the SCLC region, J∼Vm gave m to determine the current transport mechanism and the value of m changes with temperatures and applied voltages. Current transport is governed by the ZnO structure rather than the electrodes.

Keywords

oxidethin filmion-implantation
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1201: Symposium H – Zinc Oxide and Related Materials-2009 , 2009 , 1201-H05-41
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Basak, D., Amin, G., Mallik, B., Paul, G. K., and Sen, S. K., “Photoconductive UV detectors on sol-gel-synthesized ZnO films,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 256, pp. 73–77, 2003.10.1016/S0022-0248(03)01304-6Google Scholar
[2] Yen, T. F., Strome, D., Kim, S. J., Cartwright, A. N., and Anderson, W. A., “Annealing studies on zinc oxide thin films deposited by magnetron sputtering,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 37, pp. 764–769, May 2008.10.1007/s11664-007-0357-4Google Scholar
[3] Yen, T., DiNezza, M., Haungs, A., Kim, S. J., Anderson, W. A., and Cartwright, A. N., “Effects of nitrogen doping of ZnO during or after deposition,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, vol. 27, pp. 1943–1948, 2009.10.1116/1.3167363Google Scholar
[4] Ng, K. K., Complete Guide To Semiconductor Devices: Wiley Interscience, 2002.Google Scholar
[5] Campbell, A.J., Bradley, D. D. C., and Lidzey, D. G., “Space-charge limited conduction with traps in poly (phenylene vinylene) light emitting diodes,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 82, pp. 6326–6342, Dec 1997.10.1063/1.366523Google Scholar
[6] Ilegems, M. and Queisser, H. J., “Current transport in relaxation-case GaAs,” Physical Review B, vol. 12, pp. 1443–1451, 1975.10.1103/PhysRevB.12.1443Google Scholar
[7] Roberts, G. G., “Electron Injection into a p-Type Semiconductor,” Physica Status Solidi (b), vol. 27, pp. 209–218, 1968.10.1002/pssb.19680270122Google Scholar