Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:46:08.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crystal Quality of III-V Substrate Wafers and Epitaxial Layers Studied by X-Ray Topography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

I. C. Bassignana
Affiliation:
Advanced Technology Laboratory, Bell-Northern Research Ltd.P. O.. Box 3511 Stn.“C”, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada KIY 4H7
D. A. Macquistan
Affiliation:
Advanced Technology Laboratory, Bell-Northern Research Ltd.P. O.. Box 3511 Stn.“C”, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada KIY 4H7
Get access

Abstract

The crystal quality of III-V substrates was studied by x-ray asymmetric crystal topography (ACT). An extensive study of device-quality GaAs (LEC SI, LEC n-type, VGF and VB) and InP (LEC n-type (S) and SI (Fe) ) wafers reveals that they can contain various defects: low angle grain boundaries, dislocation cell structure, slip, swirl and included mosaic structure.

The high angular resolution of ACT was used to non-destructively study both the epitaxial layer and the substrate. Topographs of the substrate and the epitaxial layers of AlGaAs/GaAs layers grown by MBE and MOCVD are compared. The quality of the substrate has direct implications for the quality of the epitaxial growth. For coherent layers, both the large scale and small scale defects observed in the substrates were exactly reproduced in the epitaxial layers grown by both techniques.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bassignana, I. C. and Macquistan, D. A., accepted for publication in Semi-Insulating III-V Materials. Ixtapa 1992, to be published in 1993.Google Scholar
2. Miyazawa, S., Ishii, Y., Ishida, S. and Nanishi, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43 (9), 853 (1983)Google Scholar
3. Clackson, S. G., Moore, M. and Kitching, S. A., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 7, 12 (1992)Google Scholar
4. Puetz, N., Hillier, G. and SpringThorpe, A. J., J. Electronic Materials 17 (5), 381 1988 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Steiner, B., Kuriyama, M., Dobbyn, R. C., Prog. Crystal Growth and Charact. 20, 189 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Jordan, A. S., Caruso, R., Von Neida, A. R., Bell System Tech. J. 59, 573 (1980)Google Scholar
7. Wang, F-C., Rau, M-F, Kurz, J., Ehman, M. F., Liao, D-D., Carter, R., Defect Recognition and Image Processing in III-V Comoounds. II. edited by Weber, E. R. (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1987) p.117 Google Scholar
8. Chen, T. P., Chen, L. J., Huang, T. S. and Guo, Y. D., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 7, A300 (1992)Google Scholar
9. Cockayne, B., MacEwan, W. R. and Hope, D. A. O., Harris, I. R. and Smith, N. A., J.Crystal Growth 87, 6 (1988)Google Scholar
10. Rumsby, D., Ware, R. M. and Whittaker, M., J.Cryst. Growth 54, 32 (1981)Google Scholar
11. Miyazawa, S. and Koizumi, H., J.Electrochem Soc. 129, 2335 (1982)Google Scholar
12. Smith, N. A., Harris, I. R., Cockayne, B. and MacEwan, W. R., J.Crystr. Growth 69, 10 (1984)Google Scholar
13. Chu, S. N. G., Nakahara, S., Long, J. A., Riggs, V. G., Johnston, W. D., Jr, J.Electrochem. Soc. 132 (11), 2795 (1985)Google Scholar
14. Trapp, K. D. C., Asom, M. T., Carver, G. E., Monberg, E. M., Thiel, F. A. and Barnes, R. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 145, 499 (1989)Google Scholar
15. Stringfellow, G. B., Organometallic Vaoor Phase Epitaxy: Theor and Practice, (Academic Press, New York, 1989), Chap.7.Google Scholar
16. Matthews, J. W. and Blakeslee, A. E., J.Cryst. Growth 27, 118 (1974)Google Scholar