Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:36:53.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crucible Steel in South India-Preliminary Investigations on Crucibles from Some Newly Identified Sites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Sharada Srinivasan
Sharada Srinivasan*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, and Dafydd Griffiths, Institute of Archaeology, University College London
Get access

Abstract

European accounts from the 17th century onwards have referred to the repute and manufacture of “wootz’, a traditional crucible steel made especially in parts of southern India in the former provinces of Golconda, Mysore and Salem. Pliny's Natural History mentions the import of iron and steel from the Seres which have been thought to refer to the ancient southern Indian kingdom of the Cheras. As yet the scale of excavations and surface surveys is too limited to link the literary accounts to archaeometallurgical evidence, although pioneering exploratory investigations have been made by scholars, especially on the pre-industrial production sites of Konasamudram and Gatihosahalli discussed in 18th-19th century European accounts. In 1991–2 during preliminary surveys of ancient base metal mining sites, Srinivasan came across unreported dumps with crucible fragments at Mel-Siruvalur in Tamil Nadu, and Tintini and Machnur in Karnataka and she collected surface specimens from these sites as well as from the known site of Gatihosahalli. She was also given crucible fragments by the Tamil University, Tanjavur, from an excavated megalithic site at Kodumanal, dated to ca 2nd c. Bc, mentioned in Tamil Sangam literature (ca 3rd c. BC-3rd c. AD), and very near Karur, the ancient capital of the Sangam Cheras. Analyses of crucible fragments from the surface collection at Mel-Siruvalur showed several iron prills with a uniform pearlitic structure of high-carbon hypereutectoid steel (∼1–1.5% C) suggesting that the end product was uniformly a high-carbon steel of a structure consistent with those of high-carbon steels used successfully to experimentally replicate the watered steel patterns on ‘Damascus’ swords. Investigations indicate that the process was of carburisation of molten low carbon iron (m.p. 1400° C) in crucibles packed with carbonaceous matter. The fabric of crucibles from all the above mentioned sites appears similar. Preliminary investigations on these crucibles are thus reported to establish their relationship to crucible production of carbon steel and to thereby extend the known horizons of this technology further.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 462: Symposium DD – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology V , 1996 , 111
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Avner, S.H. 1988. Introduction to Physical Metallurgy. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Google Scholar
Bronson, B. 1986. The making and selling of wootz- a crucible steel of India. Archaeo-malerials. 1(1): 13–51 Google Scholar
Buchanan-Hamilton, Frances. 1807. A journey from Madras through the countries of Mysore, Cañara and Malabar. London Google Scholar
Craddock, P.T. 1995. Early Metal Mining and Production. edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. 1951. Taxila. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Merkel, J., Feuerbach, A. and Griffiths, D. June 1995. Analytical investigation of crucihle steel production at Merv, Turkmenistan. IAMS Newsletter. 19: 12–14. London: Institute of Archaeometallurgical Studies.Google Scholar
Rostoker, W. and Bronson, B. 1990. Pre-industrial Iron. Its Technology and Ethnology. Philadelphia: Arcliaeomaterials Monograph No. 1. Google Scholar
Schoff, W.H. 1915. The eastern iron trade of the Roman empire. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 35: 224–239 Google Scholar
Scott, D. A. 1991: Metallography and Microstructure of Ancient and Historie Metals. Singapore: The J. Paul Getty Trust Google Scholar
Smith, C.S. 1960. A History of Metallography. The Development of Ideas on the Structure of Metals before 1890. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, S. 1994. Metallurgical investigations on later Roman and Indo-Roman coins from Karur. In: Krishnamurthy, R. (ed.). Late Roman Copper Coins from South India: Karur and Madurai. Madras: Garnet Publications, 121–33.Google Scholar
Voysey, H. W. 1832. Description of the manufacture of steel in Southern India. Journal of Asiatic Society of Bengal. 1: 245–47Google Scholar
Wadsworth, J. and Sherby, O. 1980. On the Bulat-Damascus steels revisited. Progress in Materials Science. 25: 35–68.Google Scholar
Wood, C. 1893. Discussion of Turner's paper on production of iron in small furnaces in India. Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute. 44 (2): 177–180 Google Scholar