Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:36:58.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Creating Nanoporosity by Selective Extraction of Porogens Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide/Cosolvent Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

B. Lahlouh
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock TX 79409
T. Rajagopalan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock TX 79409
J. A. Lubguban
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock TX 79409
N. Biswas
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock TX 79409
S. Gangopadhyaya
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock TX 79409
J. Sun
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock TX 79409
D. Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock TX 79409
S. L. Simon
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock TX 79409
H. C. Kim
Affiliation:
IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA
W. Volksen
Affiliation:
IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA
R. D. Miller
Affiliation:
IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA
Get access

Abstract

This work presents a novel approach using supercritical carbon dioxide (SCCO2) to selectively extract poly(propylene glycol) (PPG) porogen from a poly(methylsilsesquioxane) (PMSSQ) matrix, which results in the formation of nanopores. Nanoporous thin films were prepared by spin-casting a solution containing appropriate quantities of PPG porogen and PMSSQ dissolved in PM acetate. The as-spun films were thermally cured at temperatures well below the thermal degradation temperature of the organic polymer to form a cross-linked organic/inorganic polymer hybrid. By selectively removing the CO2 soluble PPG porogen, open and closed pore structures are possible depending upon the porogen load and its distribution in the matrix before extraction. In the present work, two different loadings of PPG namely 25 wt.% and 55 wt.% were used. Both static SCCO2 and pulsed SCCO2/cosolvent treatments were used for PPG extraction. The initial results indicate that the pulsed SCCO2/cosolovent treatment was more efficient. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and refractive index measurements further corroborate the successful extraction of the porogens at relatively low temperatures (2000C). For the pure PMSSQ film, the k value is 3.1, whereas it is 1.46 and 2.27 for the open and closed pore compositions respectively after the static SCCO2 extraction and 430°C subsequent annealing. The reduction in the k-value is attributed to the formation of nanopores. The pore structure was verified from transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and from small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements, the pore size was determined to be 1-3 nm for these films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Low-Dielectric-Constant Materials, MRS Bulletin. Oct. 1997 (22)10.Google Scholar
2. Zorich, R., “Advance Technology Report: Copper Interconnect and Low-k Dielectric Technologies”, Integrated Circuit Engineering.Google Scholar
3.The International Technology Roadmap For Semiconductors: 2001 ed.Google Scholar
4. Colomer, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 565, 211 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Kohl, P., Padovani, A., Wedlake, M., Bhusari, D., Ann, S., Allen, b., Shick, R., Rhodes, L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 565, 55 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Hong, J., Kim, H., Park, H., Thin Solid Films, 332, 449 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Grill, A., Patel, V., Appl. Phys. Lett., 79, 803 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Nguyen, C. V., Carter, K.R., Hawker, C. J., Hedrick, J. L., Jaffe, R. L., Miller, R.D., Remenar, J. F., Rhee, H.W., Rice, P.M., Toney, M. F., Trollsas, M., and Yoon, D. Y., Chem.Mater. 11, 3080 (1999).Google Scholar
9. Remenar, J. F., Hawker, C. J., Hedrick, J. L., Kim, S. M., Miller, R. D., Nguyen, C. V., Trollsas, M., and Yoon, D. Y., Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 511, 69 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Bolze, J., Ree, M., Youn, H. S., Chu, S.H. and Char, K., Langmuir, 17, 6683 (2001).Google Scholar
11. Taylor, L. T., Supercritical Fluid Extraction, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Google Scholar
12. McHardy, J., Stanford, T. B., Benjamin, L. R., Whiting, T. E., Chao, S. C., SAMPE Journal, 29, 20(1993).Google Scholar
13. Rajagopalan, T., Sun, J., Lahlouh, B., Lubguban, J. A., Huang, D. H., Biswas, N., Simon, S. L., Gangopadhyay, S., Mallikarjunan, A., Kim, H.C., Volksen, W., Toney, M. F., Huang, E., Rice, P. M., Delenia, E., Miller, R. D. (In press, APL 2003).Google Scholar
14. Lee, L.H., Chen, W.C. and Liu, W.C., J.Polym Sci Part A: Polym. Chem 40 1560 (2002).Google Scholar
15. Chen, W.C., Lin, A.C., Dai, B.T. and Tsai, M.S., J. of Electrochem. Soc., 146, 3004 (1999).Google Scholar
16. Chen, W.C. and Yen, C.T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol B, 18, 201 (2000).Google Scholar
17. Socrates, G., Infrared Characteristics Group Frequencies, (J. Wiley, New York 1994).Google Scholar
18. Lubguban, J., Rajagopalan, T., Mehta, N., Lahlouh, B., Simon, S.L. and Gangopadhyay, S., J. Appl. Phys. 92(2), 1033 (2002).Google Scholar
19. Ogawa, S., Nasuno, T., Egami, M., Nakashima, A., International Interconnect Technology Conference, June 3-5 (2002), San Francisco, CA. Google Scholar