Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:53:09.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corrosion Mechanisms of Spent Fuel Under Oxidizing Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

P. A. Finn
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439USA
R. Finch
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439USA
E. Buck
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439USA
J. Bates
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439USA
Get access

Abstract

The release of 99Tc can be used as a reliable marker for the extent of spent oxide fuel reaction under unsaturated high-drip-rate conditions at 90°C. Evidence from leachate data and from scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM) examination of reacted fuel samples is presented for radionuclide release, potential reaction pathways, and the formation of alteration products. In the ATM-103 fuel, 0.03 of the total inventory of 99Tc is released in 3.7 years under unsaturated and oxidizing conditions. Two reaction pathways that have been identified from SEM are 1) through-grain dissolution with subsequent formation of uranyl alteration products, and 2) grain-boundary dissolution. The major alteration product identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and SEM, is Na-boltwoodite, Na[(UO2)(SiO3OH)]H20, which is formed from sodium and silicon in the water leachant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Guenther, R. J. et al., Characterization of Spent Fuel Approved Testing Material -ATM-103, Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report PNL-5109-103 (1988).Google Scholar
2 Guenther, R. J. et al. , Characterization of Spent Fuel Approved Testing Material - ATM-106, Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report PNL-5109-106 (1988).Google Scholar
3 Gray, W. J., Strachan, D. M., and Wilson, C. N., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 257, 353 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Finn, P. A., Buck, E. C., Gong, M.. Hoh, J. C., Emery, J. W., Hafenrichter, L. D., and Bates, J. K., Radiochimica Acta, 66/67, 189 (1994).Google Scholar
5 Buck, E.C. and Fortner, J.A., Ultramicroscopy 67, 6975 (1997).Google Scholar
6 Finn, P.A., Hoh, J.C., Wolf, S. F., Surchik, M. T., Buck, E. C., and Bates, J. K., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 465, 527534 (1997).Google Scholar
7 Buck, E. C., Wronkiewicz, D. J., Finn, P. A., & Bates, J. K., accepted J. Nucl. Mater. (1997).Google Scholar
8 Buck, E. C., Finch, R. J., Finn, P. A., and Bates, J. K., this proceeding.Google Scholar
9 Hagymassy, J., Brunauer, S., and Mikhail, R. Sh., J. Coll. Inter. Sci. 29, 485 (1969). On powdered materials at 100% RH, six monolayers of water (each 0.3 nm) were observed to sorb.Google Scholar
10 Shoesmith, D. W., Sunder, S., Johnson, L. H., and Bailey, M. G., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 50, 309316 (1985).Google Scholar