Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:35:01.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corrosion Behavior of Pyrochlore-Rich Titanate Ceramics For Plutonium Disposition; Impurity Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. J. Bakel ,
V. N. Zyryanov ,
C. J. Mertz ,
E. C. Buck  and
D. B. Chamberlain
A. J. Bakel
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 60439
V. N. Zyryanov
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 60439
C. J. Mertz
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 60439
E. C. Buck
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 60439
D. B. Chamberlain
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 60439
Get access

Abstract

Four titanate ceramics were characterized and tested. These ceramics were similar to those proposed for Pu disposition, with Ce as a surrogate for Pu. The baseline ceramic contained Ti, U, Ca, Hf, Gd, and Ce, and was made up of only four crystalline phases: pyrochlore, zirconolite, rutile, and brannerite. The three other ceramics contained different amounts of impurities that are expected in the feed. Impurities are defined as any element other than Ti, U, Ca, Hf, Gd, and Ce. The ceramics that contained impurities contained different phases than the baseline. The addition of impurities led to the absence of brannerite and the presence of amorphous silicate, Ca-Al-Ti, and perovskite phases. The results from 3 day, 90°C MCC-I tests with impurity ceramics were significantly different than the results from tests with the baseline ceramic. Overall, the addition of impurities to these titanate ceramics altered the phase assemblages, which in turn, affected the corrosion behavior.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 556: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII , 1999 , 181
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 ASTM (1992). Test Method for Static Leaching of Monolithic Waste Forms for Disposal of Radioactive Wastes. ASTM Standard C 1220-92, ASTM, Philadelphia PA.Google Scholar
2 Ebbinghaus, B. (1998). Baseline Formulation Milestone Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (in press).Google Scholar
3 Mazzi, F., and Munno, R. (1983). Pyrochlore and Related Phases. Am. Min. 68, 262–276.Google Scholar
4 Ringwood, A. E., Kesson, S. E., Reeve, K. D., Levins, D. M., and Ramm, E. J. (1988) Synroc, in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future (eds., Lutze, W. and Ewing, R. C.), Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.Google Scholar
5 Cooper, J. A., Cousens, D. R., Hanna, J. A., Lewis, R. A., Myhra, S., Segall, R. L., Smart, R. St. C., Turner, P. S., and White, T. J. (1986). Intergranular Films and Pore Surfaces in Synroc C: Structure, Composition, and Dissolution Characteristics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 69, 347–352.Google Scholar
6 Buck, E. C., Ebbinghaus, B. B., Bakel, A. J., and Bates, J. K., (1997). Characterization of a Plutonium-Bearing Zirconolite-Rich Ceramic, Material Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 465, 1259–1266.Google Scholar