Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:22:31.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlation and Spectral-Density Roughness Analysis of Surfaces Processed With Gas-Cluster Ion Beams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

D. B. Fenner*
Affiliation:
Epion Corporation, 37 Manning Road, Billerica, MA 01821, and Physics Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269
Get access

Abstract

Autocorrelation, height-difference correlation, and power spectral density are used to characterize various surfaces exposed to gas-cluster ion beams (GCIB), as well as for detailed comparison with simulated surfaces which are based on models with stochastic impact and surface mobility mechanisms. This work demonstrates a close correspondance between detailed statistical analysis of AFM images from actual surfaces and the results of the same types of analysis of simulated surfaces. Surface roughness prior to and after GCIB treatment is always found to be essentially fractal in nature. Phenomenological models with both continuum surface mobility and Monte Carlo impact accumulations are presented. Accurate simulation of smoothing requires a combination of these models.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Volkert, C.A., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 3521 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Mayer, T.M., Chason, E. and Howard, A.J., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 1633 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Brongersma, M.L., Snoeks, E., van Dillen, T. and Polman, A., J. Appl. Phys. 88, 59 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Yamada, I., Matsuo, J., Toyoda, N. and Kirkpatrick, A., Mat. Sci Eng. R 34, 231 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Fenner, D.B., “Gas-Cluster Ion Beams”, in Engineering Thin Films with Ion Beams, edited by Knystautas, E. (Marcel Dekker pub, New York, in press).Google Scholar
6. Fenner, D.B., Hautala, J., Allen, L.P., Greer, J.A., Skinner, W.J. and Budnick, J.I., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 614, F10.3.1 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Fenner, D.B., DiFilippo, V., Bennett, J., Hirvonen, J., Demaree, J.D., Tetreault, T., Feldman, L.C. and Saigal, A., Proc. SPIE, 4468, 17 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Allen, L.P., Insepov, Z., Fenner, D.B., Santeufemio, C., Brooks, W., Jones, K.S. and Yamada, I., J. Appl. Phys. 92, 3671 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Toyoda, N., Hagiwara, N., Matsuo, J. and Yamada, I., Nuc. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B 161–163, 980 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Fenner, D.B., Dean, D.W., DiFilippo, V., Allen, L.P., Hautala, J. and Mirkarimi, P.B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 647, O5.2.1 (2001).Google Scholar
11. Aoki, T., Nakai, A., Matsuo, J. and Takaoka, G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 749, W17.9.1 (2003).Google Scholar
12. Fenner, D.B. (manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
13. Barabasi, A.-L. and Stanley, H.E., Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge Press, New York, 1995).Google Scholar
14. Bennett, J.M. and Mattson, L., Introduction to Surface Roughness and Scattering, 2nd edition (Optical Society Amer., Wash. DC, 1999).Google Scholar