Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:14:06.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The contribution of the N- and C- terminal domains to the stretching properties of intermediate filaments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Laurent Kreplak
Laurent Kreplak*
Affiliation:
[email protected] UniversityPhysics and Atmospheric Science, halifax, Canada
Get access

Abstract

The animal cell cytoskeleton consists of three interconnected filament systems: actin containing microfilaments (MFs), microtubules (MTs), and intermediate filaments (IFs). Among these three filaments systems, IFs are the only one that show high extensibility at both the single filament and network levels. In this work, I am presenting a simple model of IFs extensibility based on the current structural knowledge of the filaments. The only extra information added to this model compared to previous ones is the fact that the unfolded N- and C-termini of IF proteins are sandwiched between adjacent coiled-coil rod domains within the filaments. Since we know the contour length and typical persistence length of these unfolded termini, it is possible to predict the persistence length of a single filament, its maximal extensibility and the onset of coiled-coil unfolding. The predictions of the model are in good agreement with experiments on single desmin IFs stretched on a surface by AFM and on vimentin and desmin networks probed by rheology.

Keywords

biomaterialelastic propertiesstress/strain relationship
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1274: Symposium QQ – Biological Materials and Structures in Physiologically Extreme Conditions and Disease , 2010 , 1274-QQ02-06
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Aziz, A., Hess, J.F. Budamagunta, M.S. Voss, J.C. Fitzgerald, P.G. 2009. SDSL EPR determination of vimentin head domain structure. J Biol Chem. in press.Google Scholar
2 Kreplak, L. Fudge, D. 2007. Biomechanical properties of intermediate filaments: from tissues to single filaments and back. Bioessays. 29, 26–35.Google Scholar
3 Kreplak, L. Aebi, U. Herrmann, H. 2004. Molecular mechanisms underlying the assembly of intermediate filaments. Exp Cell Res. 301, 77–83.Google Scholar
4 Buehler, M. J. Acbarow, T. 2007. Fracture mechanics of protein materials. Mat Today. 10, 46–58.Google Scholar
5 Hearle, J.W. 2000. A critical review of the structural mechanics of wool and hair fibres. Int J Biol Macromol. 27, 123–138.Google Scholar
6 Fudge, D.S. Gardner, K.H. Forsyth, V.T. Riekel, C. Gosline, J.M. 2003. The mechanical properties of hydrated intermediate filaments: insights from hagfish slime threads. Biophys J. 85, 2015–2027.Google Scholar
7 Bar, H. Mucke, N. Ringler, P. Muller, S.A. Kreplak, L. Katus, H.A. Aebi, U. Herrmann, H., 2006. Impact of disease mutations on the desmin filament assembly process. J Mol Biol. 360, 1031–1042.Google Scholar
8 Lim, R.Y. Koser, J. Huang, N.P. Schwarz-Herion, K. Aebi, U. 2007. Nanomechanical interactions of phenylalanine-glycine nucleoporins studied by single molecule force-volume spectroscopy. J Struct Biol. 159, 277–289.Google Scholar
9 Schwaiger, I. Sattler, C. Hostetter, D.R. Rief, M. 2002. The myosin coiled-coil is a truly elastic protein structure. Nat Mater. 1, 232–235.Google Scholar
10 Bustamante, C. Marko, J.F. Siggia, E.D. Smith, S. 1994. Entropic elasticity of lambdaphage DNA. Science. 265, 1599–1600.Google Scholar
11 Mucke, N. Kreplak, L. Kirmse, R. Wedig, T. Herrmann, H. Aebi, U. Langowski, J. 2004. Assessing the flexibility of intermediate filaments by atomic force microscopy. J Mol Biol. 335, 1241–1250.Google Scholar
12 Staple, D.B. Loparic, M. Kreuzer, H.J. Kreplak, L. 2009. Stretching, unfolding, and deforming protein filaments adsorbed at solid-liquid interfaces using the tip of an atomic-force microscope. Phys Rev Lett. 102, 128302.Google Scholar
13 Root, D.D. Yadavalli, V.K. Forbes, J.G. Wang, K. 2006. Coiled-coil nanomechanics and uncoiling and unfolding of the superhelix and alpha-helices of myosin. Biophys J. 90, 2852–2866.Google Scholar
14 Schopferer, M. Bar, H. Hochstein, B. Sharma, S. Mucke, N. Herrmann, H. Willenbacher, N., 2009. Desmin and vimentin intermediate filament networks: their viscoelastic properties investigated by mechanical rheometry. J Mol Biol. 388, 133–143.Google Scholar
15 Kreplak, L. Herrmann, H. Aebi, U. 2008. Tensile properties of single desmin intermediate filaments. Biophys J. 94, 2790–2799.Google Scholar
16 Qin, Z. Kreplak, L. Buehler, M. J. 2009. Hierarchical structure controls nanomechanical properties of vimentin intermediate filaments. PloS ONE. 4, e7294.Google Scholar
17 Herrmann, H. Haner, M. Brettel, M. Muller, S.A. Goldie, K.N. Fedtke, B. Lustig, A. Franke, W.W. Aebi, U. 1996. Structure and assembly properties of the intermediate filament protein vimentin: the role of its head, rod and tail domains. J Mol Biol. 264, 933–953.Google Scholar
18 Lin, Y.C. Yao, N.Y. Broedersz, C.P. Herrmann, H. Mackintosh, F.C. Weitz, D.A. 2010. Origins of elasticity in intermediate filament networks. Phys Rev Lett. 104, 058101.Google Scholar