Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:43:38.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constraint Effects on Cohesive Failures in Low-k Dielectric Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Ting Y. Tsui ,
Andrew J. McKerrow  and
Joost J. Vlassak
Ting Y. Tsui
Affiliation:
Silicon Technology Development, Texas Instruments Inc, Dallas, TX 75246, U.S.A. Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138
Andrew J. McKerrow
Affiliation:
Silicon Technology Development, Texas Instruments Inc, Dallas, TX 75246, U.S.A. Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138
Joost J. Vlassak
Affiliation:
Silicon Technology Development, Texas Instruments Inc, Dallas, TX 75246, U.S.A. Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138
Get access

Abstract

One of the most common forms of cohesive failure observed in brittle thin films subjected to a tensile residual stress is channel cracking, a fracture mode in which through-film cracks propagate in the film. The crack growth rate depends on intrinsic film properties, residual stress, the presence of reactive species in the environment, and the precise film stack. In this paper, we investigate the effect of various buffer layers sandwiched between a brittle carbon-doped-silicate (CDS) film and a silicon substrate on channel cracking of the CDS film. The results show that channel cracking is enhanced if the buffer layer is more compliant than the silicon substrate. Crack velocity increases with increasing buffer layer thickness and decreasing buffer layer stiffness. This is caused by a reduction of the constraint imposed by the substrate on the film and a commensurate increase in energy release rate. The degree of constraint is characterized experimentally as a function of buffer layer thickness and stiffness, and compared to the results of a simple shear lag model that was proposed previously.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 863: Symposium B – Materials, Technology and Reliability of Advanced Interconnects , 2005 , B4.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ma, Q., “A Four-Point Bending Technique for Studying Subcritical Crack Growth in Thin Films and at Interfaces”, J. Mat. Res., 12, 840–845 (1997)Google Scholar
2. Lane, M., Krishna, N., Hashim, I., and Dauskardt, R. H., “Adhesion and Reliability of Copper Interconnects with Ta and TaN Barrier Layers”, J. Mat. Res., 15 [1] 203–211, (2000)Google Scholar
3. Tsui, Ting Y., Griffin, A. J. Jr, Jacques, Jeannette, Fields, Russell, McKerrow, Andrew J., and Kraft, Robert, “Effects of Elastic Modulus on the Fracture Behavior of Low-Dielectric Constant Films”, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference, IEEE Electronic Devices Society, Burlingame, California, June 2005.Google Scholar
4. Volinsky, A.A., Waters, P., Kiely, J.D., Johns, E., “Sub-Critical Telephone Cord Delamination Propagation”, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 854E, U9.5 (2004)Google Scholar
5. Vlassak, J.J., “Channel cracking in thin films on substrates of finite thickness”, International Journal of Fracture 119 (4), 299–312 (2003)Google Scholar
6. Cook, R.F. and Liniger, E.G., “Stress-corrosion cracking of low-dielectric-constant spin-on-glass thin films”, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 146, 4439–48 (1999)Google Scholar
7. Beuth, J.L. Jr, “Cracking of thin bonded films in residual tension”, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 29, 1657–75 (1992)Google Scholar
8. Dundurs, J. “Edge-bonded dissimilar orthogonal elastic wedges”, J. Appl. Mech., 36, 650–652 (1969)Google Scholar
9. Lawn, B.R., Fracture of Brittle Solids, 2nd ed. (Cambridge Press, Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar
10. Wiederhorn, S. M. and Johnson, H., “Effect of Electrolyte pH on Crack Propagation in Glass”, Journal of The American Ceramic Society, 56 (4), 192 (1973).Google Scholar
11. Courtney, T. H., Mechanical Behavior of Materials, (McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, 1990).Google Scholar
12. Suo, Z., “Reliability of interconnect structures”, in Comprehensive Structural Integrity, Vol 8, Interfacial and Nanoscale Fracture, p 265–324, edited by Milne, I., Ritchie, R.O., and Karihaloo, B. (Elsevier, 2003)Google Scholar
13. He, Jun, Xu, Guanghai, and Suo, Z., “Experimental Determination of Crack Driving Forces in Integrated Structures”, Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Stress-Induced Phenomena in Metallization, Austin, Texas, edited by Ho, P.SW., Baker, S.P., Nakamura, T., Volkert, C.A., American Institute of Physics, New York, pp 3–14, June 2004.Google Scholar