Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:48:25.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conduction in Polycrystalline Silicon: Generalized Thermionic Emission-Diffusion Theory and Extended State Mobility Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A.N. Khondker
Affiliation:
*Electrical Engineering Department, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77251
D.M. Kim
Affiliation:
*Electrical Engineering Department, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77251
R.R. Shah
Affiliation:
*Electrical Engineering Department, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77251
Get access

Abstract

We present a general theory of conduction in polysilicon. The theoretical framework reconciles two apparently divergent approaches for modeling conduction processes in polysilicon and provides a physical basis to correctly interpret and to point out the deficiencies of previously reported thermionic and thermionic field emission theory. This model is based on an extended state mobility in the disordered grain boundary and the thermionic emission-diffusion theory for conduction of current. The attractive features of our theory are (a) it can explain the experimental data without the use of an artificial factor, f, (b) the conduction process is characterized explicitly by the inherent material properties of the grain and the grain boundary. Our model is particularly suited for describing the electrical properties of laser restructured polysilicon, where because of large grain size the diffusion process is expected to be dominant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Seto, J.Y.W., J. Appl. Phys., vol. 46, pp. 5247–5244 (1975).Google Scholar
[2]Lu, N.C.C., Gerzberg, L., Lu, C.Y., and Meindl, J.D., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED–28, pp. 818830 (1981).Google Scholar
[3]Mandurah, M.M., Saraswat, K.C., and Kamins, T.I., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED–28, pp. 11631170 (1981).Google Scholar
[4]Lu, N.C.C., Gerzberg, L., Lu, C.Y., and Meindl, J.D., Electron Device Lett., EDL–2, pp. 9598 (1981).Google Scholar
[5]Wu, C.M. and Yang, E.S., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 40, pp. 4951 (1982).Google Scholar
[6]Kim, D.M., Khondker, A.N., Shah, R.R., and Crosthwait, D.L., IEEE Electron. Device Lett., EDL–3, No. 5, pp. 141143 (1982).Google Scholar
[7]Sze, S.M., Physics of Semiconductor Devices (New York: John Wiley, 1981).Google Scholar