Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:59:31.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computer Simulation of Vacancy Segregation at Antiphase Domain Boundaries During Coarsening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Long-Qing Chen
Long-Qing Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

A computer simulation technique based on the Master Equation Method (MEM) is developed for modeling the spatial distribution of vacancies during ordering and subsequent domain coalescence and coarsening. A vacancy mechanism is assumed for the atomic diffusion and the single-site approximation is employed. It is demonstrated that vacancies strongly segregate into the antiphase domain boundaries (APBs) during coarsening, resulting in the vacancy concentration at APBs more than an order of magnitude higher than that inside the ordered domains. As the antiphase domains coarsen, the vacancy concentration at the APBs continues to increase and its spatial s segregation profile moves accompanying the APB migration. The effect of vacancy concentration on the antiphase domain coarsening kinetics is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 319: Symposia CB – Defect-Interface Interactions , 1993 , 375
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Manning, J. R., Diffusion Kinetics for Atoms in Crystals, Van Nostrand, Princeton, N.J. (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chen, L. Q. and Khachaturyan, A. G., Acta metall. et mater., Vol. 39, 2533 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Khachaturyan, A. G., Soy. Phys. Solid State, Vol. 9, 2040 (1968).Google Scholar
4. Vineyard, G. H., Phys. Rev., Vol. 102, 981 (1956).Google Scholar
5. lida, S., J. of the Physical Society of Japan, Vol. 10, 769 (1955).Google Scholar
6. Yamauchi, H. and Fontaine, D. de, in “Order- Disorder Transformations in Alloys”, Warlimont, H., ed, Springer, Berlin, 148 (1974).Google Scholar
7. Baal, C. M. Van, Physica A Vol. 111, 591 (1982); C. M. Van Baal, Physica A Vol. 113, 117 (1982); Physica A Vol. 196, 116 (1993)Google Scholar
8. Baal, C. M. Van, Physica A Vol. 129, 601 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Anthony, L. and Fultz, B., J. Mater. Res., Vol. 4, 1132 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Fultz, B., Acta metall. Vol. 37, 823 (1989); J. Mater. Res., Vol. 5, 1419 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Yaldram, K. and Binder, K., Acta metall. et mater., Vol. 39, 707 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Mouritsen, O. G., Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 32, 1632 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Shah, P. J. and Mouritsen, O. G., Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 41, 7003 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Srolovitz, D. J. and Hassold, G. N., Phys. Rev. B., Vol. 35, 6902 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar