Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:30:55.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Composite Structural Mechanics of Dorsal Lamella in Remora Fish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2014

Michael Culler
Affiliation:
Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology; Atlanta, GA
Jason H. Nadler
Affiliation:
Electro-Optical Systems Laboratory, Georgia Tech Research Institute; Atlanta, GA
Get access

Abstract

Remora fish have evolved a unique dorsal pad capable of fast, reversible adhesion to a large range of natural and artificial surfaces. The effectiveness of adhesion is due in part to the pad’s ability to dynamically conform and adapt to the geometry of its host. Simulations based on measured material properties and geometry can provide useful design metrics for biologically inspired design, and furthermore, serve as platform for virtual experiments. The pad itself consists of a lamellar, composite structure composed of mineralized and soft tissue. In this work, finite element models based on μCT scans and measured viscoelastic material properties elucidate the pad’s complex moduli frequency spectrum and response to different loading configurations.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fertl, D. and Landry, A.M., Sharksucker (Echeneis naucrates) on a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and a review of other cetacean-remora associations . Marine Mammal Science, 1999. 15(3): p. 859863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, J.H., et al. . Structures and Function of Remora Adhesion. in MRS Spring Meeting 2013. 2013. San Fransisco, CA.Google Scholar
Fulcher, B.A. and Motta, P.J., Suction disk performance of echeneid fishes . Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie, 2006. 84(1): p. 4250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, L.K. and Wang, M.J.J., IMAGE THRESHOLDING BY MINIMIZING THE MEASURES OF FUZZINESS . Pattern Recognition, 1995. 28(1): p. 4151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, Y.C., Biomechanics Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. 1993: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.Google Scholar
Culler, M., Ledford, K.A., and Nadler, J.H.. The Role of Topology and Tissue Mechanics in Remora Attachment. in MRS Fall Meeting 2013. 2013. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Cohen, L., et al. ., Comparison of structural, architectural and mechanical aspects of cellular and acellular bone in two teleost fish . Journal of Experimental Biology, 2012. 215(11): p. 19831993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dean, M.N. and Shahar, R., The structure-mechanics relationship and the response to load of the acellular bone of neoteleost fish: a review . Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 2012. 28(3): p. 320329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, J.M. and Summers, A.P., The material properties of acellular bone in a teleost fish . Journal of Experimental Biology, 2009. 212(9): p. 14131420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowin, S.C. and Doty, S.B., Tissue Mechanics. 2007: Springer Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, P.W. and Keyes, R.S., SWIMMING KINEMATICS OF SHARKS . Fishery Bulletin, 1982. 80(4): p. 803812.Google Scholar