Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T07:22:29.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Complexation of Actinides with Amide Derivatives of Oxydiacetic Acid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Linfeng Rao  and
Guoxin Tian
Linfeng Rao
Affiliation:
[email protected], Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 70A-1150, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, 94720, United States
Guoxin Tian
Affiliation:
[email protected], Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Get access

Abstract

Complexation of Np(V), U(VI) and Nd(III) with dimethyl-3-oxa-glutaramic acid (DMOGA) and tetramethyl-3-oxa-glutaramide (TMOGA) was studied in comparison with the complexation with oxydiacetic acid (ODA). Stability constants and enthalpy of complexation were determined by potentiometry, spectrophotometry and calorimetry. Thermodynamic parameters, in conjunction with structural information of solid compounds, indicate that DMOGA and TMOGA form tridentate complexes with the ether-oxygen participating in bonding with actinide/lanthanide ions. The trends in the stability constants, enthalpy and entropy of complexation are discussed in terms of the difference in the hydration of the amide groups and carboxylate groups and the difference in the charge density of the metal ions.

Keywords

actinidelanthanidebonding
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 893: Symposium JJ – Actinides 2005 – Basic Science, Applications and Technology , 2005 , 0893-JJ08-06
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Suzuki, H., Sasaki, Y., Sugo, Y., Apichaibukol, A. and Kimura, T., Radiochim. Acta, 92, 463 (2004).Google Scholar
2. Tian, G., Zhang, P., Wang, J. and Rao, L., Solv. Extr. Ion Exch., 23(5), 631 (2005).Google Scholar
3. Sasaki, Y. and Choppin, G.R., Radiochim. Acta, 80, 85 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Jiang, J., Sarsfield, M.J., Renshaw, J.C., Livens, F.R., Collison, D., Charnock, J.M., Helliwell, M. and Eccles, H., Inorg. Chem. 41, 2799 (2002).Google Scholar
5. Jensen, M.P. and Nash, K.L., Radiochim. Acta, 89, 557 (2001).Google Scholar
6. Rao, L., Garnov, A.Yu., Jiang, J., Bernardo, P. Di, Zanonato, P. and Bismondo, A., Inorg. Chem., 42, 3685 (2003).Google Scholar
7. Grenthe, I., Acta Chem. Scand. 17, 2487 (1963)Google Scholar
8. Gans, P., Sabatini, A. and Vacca, A., Talanta, 43, 1739 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Zanonato, P., Bernardo, P. Di, Bismondo, A., Liu, G., Chen, X. and Rao, L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126, 5515 (2004).Google Scholar
10. Zanonato, P. (private communication).Google Scholar
11. Tian, G., Xu, J. and Rao, L., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 6200 (2005).Google Scholar
12. Tian, G. et al. (unpublished).Google Scholar