Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:43:39.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Experimental with Theoretical Melting of the Yeast Genome and Individual Yeast Chromosome Denaturation Mapping Using the Program Meltsim

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. W. Bizzaro ,
Kenneth A. Marx  and
R. D. Blake
J. W. Bizzaro
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854
Kenneth A. Marx
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854
R. D. Blake
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Biology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469 present address: Department of Chemistry, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267)
Get access

Abstract

The yeast S. cereviseae represents the first eukaryotic organism whose genome has been entirely sequenced as a result of the Human Genome Project(1). In this report we demonstrate the good agreement between an experimental high resolution melting curve of total nuclear S. cereviseae DNA and the theoretical melting calculated for the complete yeast DNA genome (12,067,277 bp: Saccharomyces Genome Database) by the statistical thermodynamics program MELTSIM, parameterized for long DNA sequences(2,3). The experimental and theoretical melting curves are both fairly symmetrical and possess nearly identical Tm values. Calculated melting of coding and flanking DNA regions indicates that flanking DNAs are more (A+T)-rich than coding sequences and account for the earliest melting DNA. Calculated melting curves of the 16 individual yeast chromosomes are very similar and with few exceptions exhibit symmetric melting curves. MELTSIM was also used to calculate a theoretical denaturation map of Chromosome III DNA. The agreement between MELTSIM calculated and experimental melting data demonstrates our ability to accurately simulate long DNA sequence melting in complex eukaryotic genomes, whose sequences are becoming increasingly available for study in public databases. This has important consequences for the understanding of sequence dependent energetic properties of DNA in their biological sequence context and also for their potential use in biomaterials applications.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 489: Symposium K – Materials Science of the Cell , 1997 , 73
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Http:llgenome-www.stanford.edulGoogle Scholar
2. S.G., Delcourtand R.D., Blake, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 15160–15169 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Blake, R.D., in Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology and Molecular Medicine, Volume 2, (Myers, R.A., ed.) VCH Publ., Basel, 1–18 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Marx, K.A., Lira, J.O., Minehan, D, Pande, R., Kamath, M and Tripathy, S., J. Intel. Material Systems and Structures, 6, 447–454 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Ftp:llgenome-ftp.stanford.edulpublyeastlgenome_seqlGoogle Scholar
6. Marx, K.A., Bizzaro, J.W. Assil, Iand Blake, R.D., Proc. Materials Research Soc.: Statistical Mechanics in Physics and Biology, (MRS, Pittsburgh, PA), 463, 147–152 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Poland, D.and Scheraga, H.A., Theory of Helix-Coil Transitions in Biopolymers, Academic Press, New York, (1970).Google Scholar
8. Poland, D., Biopolymers, 13, 1859–1871 (1974).Google Scholar
9. Fixman, M. and Friere, J., Biopolymers, 16, 2693–2704 (1977).Google Scholar
10. Blake, R.D.and Hydom, T.G., J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods, 11, 307–316 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Yen, S-W.W.and Blake, R.D., Biopolymers, 19, 681–700 (1980).Google Scholar
12. Ising, E. Physik, 31, 253 (1925).Google Scholar
13. Hill, T.L., Statistical Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York (1956).Google Scholar
14. Wartell, R.M.and Benight, A.S., Physics Rep., 126, 67–107 (1985).Google Scholar
15. Kunkel, T.A. and Bebanek, K., Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 951, 1–15 (1988).Google Scholar
16. Marx, K.A., Hess, S.T. and Blake, R.D., J. Biomol. Str. & Dyn., 11, 57–66 (1993).Google Scholar
17. Marx, K.A., Hess, S.T.and Blake, R.D., J. Biomol. Str. & Dyn., 12, 235–246 (1994).Google Scholar
18. Sharp., P.M.and Lloyd, A.T., Nucleic Acids Research, 21, 179–183 (1993).Google Scholar
19. Oliver, S.G., et al., Nature, 357, 38–46 (1992).Google Scholar