Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:58:56.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of 200 Liter and 40 Milliliter Leach Tests*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J. H. Westsik JR.,
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352
C. O. Harvey
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352
F. P. Roberts
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352
W. A. Ross
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352
R. E. Thornhill
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352
Get access

Abstract

During the past year we have conducted a modified MCC-1 leach test on a 145 kg block of a cast cement waste form. The leach vessel was a 200 liter Teflon®-lined drum and contained 97.5 liters of deionized water. The results of this large-scale leach test were compared with the results of standard MCC-1 tests (40 ml) on smaller samples of the same waste form. The ratio of leachate volumes between the large and small scale tests was 2500 and the ratio of sample masses was 150,000. The cast cement samples for both tests contained plutonium-doped incinerator ash.

The leachates from these tests were analyzed for both plutonium and the matrix elements. Evaluation of plutonium plateout in the large-scale test indicated that the majority of the plutonium leached from the samples deposits onto vessel walls and little (<3 × 10−12M) remains in solution. Comparison of elemental concentrations in the leachates indicates some differences up to 5X in the concentration in the large- and small-scale tests. The differences are attributed to differences in the solubilities of Ca, Si, and Fe at pH ˜11.5 and at pH ˜12.5. The higher pH observed for the large-scale test is a result of the larger quantities of sodium in the large block of cement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

**

Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute.

*

Work performed for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE–AC06–76RLO 1830.

References

REFERENCES

1. Materials Characterization Center, “MCC-1P Static Leach Tests Methods,” in Nuclear Waste Materials Handbook, DOE/TIC-11400 (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington 1981)Google Scholar
2. Ross, W. A. et al. , Comparative Assessment of TRU Waste Forms and Processes, PNL-4428 (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington 1982)Google Scholar
3. Ross, W. A., Westsik, J. H. Jr., Roberts, F. P. and Harvey, C. O., Comparative Leach Testing of Alternative Transuranic Waste Forms. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Ceramic Society, May 1982. PNL-SA-9963 (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington 1982)Google Scholar
4. Ross, W. R., Westsik, J. H. Jr., Roberts, F. P. and Harvey, C. O., Comparison of the Leachability of Three TRU Cement Waste Forms. This Proceeding, PNL-SA- 10490 (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington 1982)Google Scholar
5. Lindsay, W. L., Chemical Equilibria in Soils, (John Wiley & Sons, New York 1979)Google Scholar
6. Baes, C. F. Jr. and Mesmer, R. C., The Hydrolysis of Cations, (John Wiley and Sons, New York 1976)Google Scholar