Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:35:55.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison Between In-situ Annealing and External Annealing For Barium Ferrite Thin Films Made by RF Magnetron Sputtering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

A. R. Abuzir  and
W. J. Yeh
A. R. Abuzir
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of Idaho Moscow, Idaho 83844, U.S.A.
W. J. Yeh
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of Idaho Moscow, Idaho 83844, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Due to their large magnetic anisotropy perpendicular to the film plane, barium ferrite thick films (BaFe12O19, or BaM) with c-axis orientation are attractive candidates for microwave applications [1,2]. Barium ferrite thin films on silicon substrates without under layer have been deposited under various conditions by RF magnetron sputtering. The structure of the as-grown films is amorphous. External annealing in air has been done at 950°C for ten minutes to crystallize the films. C-axis oriented thin films with squareness of about 0.87 and coercivity of about 3.8KOe are obtained.

Thick BaM films with c-axis orientation are difficult to achieve with one single deposition. Multilayer technique looks promising to grow thick films [3]. The external annealing process is difficult to incorporate with the multilayer procedure. An in-situ annealing procedure has been developed to obtain films, which can be used as the basic component for future multilayer deposition. Barium ferrites are first magnetron sputtered on bare silicon substrates in Ar + O2 atmosphere at substrate temperature of 500-600°C, the deposition pressure was kept about 0.008 torr. After the deposition, the temperature of the substrate is immediately increased to about 860°C for ten minutes in 140 torr of argon (80%) and oxygen (20%) mixture of gas, which was introduced into the chamber without breaking the vacuum. With the in-situ process, c-axis oriented thin films of 0.88 squareness and coercivity value of about 4.3KOe are obtained.

Both annealing methods seem to have the similar effect on the perpendicular squareness and coercivity at various film thicknesses. The average value of the saturation magnetization Ms obtained from the in-situ annealing using multilayer technique is higher than that of the external one. We have grown films up to 1.0 micron thickness using the multilayer technique, in which three layers of 0.3 μm thickness each are deposited until the final thickness is reached. After the deposition of each layer, it was in-situ annealed before starting the deposition of the next layer. With the multilayer technique, coercivity of about 3.5 KOe and average value of the saturation magnetization Ms of about 4.0 K Gauss is obtained.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 875: Symposium O – Thin Films - Stresses and Mechanical Properties XI , 2005 , O4.22
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lebedev, Sergey V., Patton, Carl E., and Wittenauer, Michael A., J. Appl. Phys. 91, 4426 (2002).Google Scholar
2. Yoon, S. D., and Vittoria, C., Oliver, S. A., J. Appl. Phys. 93, 4023 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Gee, S. H., Hong, Y. K., Erickson, D. W., Tanaka, T., and Park, M. H., J. Appl. Phys. 93, 7507 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Zaquine, I., Benazizi, H., and Mage, J. C., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 5822 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Zhuang, Z., Rao, M., White, R. M., Laughlin, D. E., and Kryder, M. H., J. Appl. Phys. 87, 6370 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Oliver, S. A., Yoon, S. D., Kozulin, I., Chen, M. L., and Vittoria, C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3612 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Yoon, S. D., and Vittoria, C., J. Appl. Phys. 96, 2131 (2004).Google Scholar
8. Kamansanan, M. N., Chandra, S., Joshi, P. C., and Mansingh, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 3547 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Cho, T. S., Doh, S. J., Je, J. H., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 1958 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Hoshi, Y., Kubota, Y., and Kawa, H. I., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 4677 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Feng, J., Matsushita, N., Watanabe, K., Nakagawa, S., and Naoe, M., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 6139 (1999).Google Scholar
12. Wang, S. G., Yoon, S. D., and Vittoria, C., J. Appl. Phys. 92, 6728 (2002).Google Scholar
13. Zhuang, Z., Rao, M., Laughlin, D. E., and Kryder, M. H., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 6142 (1999).Google Scholar