Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:39:20.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparative Study on the Sorption of BTEX and Cr (VI) in Drinking Water by Anionic and Cationic Sorbents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

S. O Flores-Valle*
Affiliation:
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, ESIQIE, Laboratorio de Catálisis y Materiales, Av. IPN S/N Zacatenco, 07738, D. F., México.
S. P. Paredes Carrera
Affiliation:
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, ESIQIE, Laboratorio de Catálisis y Materiales, Av. IPN S/N Zacatenco, 07738, D. F., México.
M. A. Valenzuela-Zapata
Affiliation:
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, ESIQIE, Laboratorio de Catálisis y Materiales, Av. IPN S/N Zacatenco, 07738, D. F., México.
*
*Corresponding author, Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A comparative study of different sorbent materials was performed in order to propose an integrated system to eliminate both, anionic and cationic contaminant ions in drinking water, such as Cr (VI) and BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes). The adsorption process was studied using several adsorbents: activated carbon, cationic clays (bentonite) and natural zeolite as well as anionic clays (Al-Mg/Nitrate hydrotalcites). The activated carbon and natural zeolites were commercial samples, while hydrotalcite-like compounds were synthesized by an ultrasound-assisted method. It was found that although activated carbon showed a good performance in the cationic sorption, the calcined hydrotalcites presented the highest sorption capacity of chromates compared with activated carbon which had a good performance only up to 100 ppm. For higher concentrations (>100 ppm) activated carbon is saturated rapidly and its sorptive capacity is practically null.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Smith, J.A., Bartelt-Hunt, S.L., Burns, S.E., Sorption and permeability of gasoline hydrocarbons in organobentonite porous media, J.Hazard. Mater. 96 (2003) 9197.Google Scholar
[2] Joint Academies Committee on the Mexico City Water Supply, Mexico's City Water Supply, National Academy Press, Washington 1995.Google Scholar
[3] Kao, C.M., Prosser, J., Evaluation of natural attenuation rate at a gasoline spill site, J. Hazard. Mater. 82 (2001) 275289.Google Scholar
[4] S.O Flores, Project Technical Report “Estudio de Alternativas Tecnológicas de Bajo Costo para el Mejoramiento de la Calidad del Agua Potable en el D.F., http://www.icyt.df.gob.mx/, (2009).Google Scholar
[5] Hoffmann, M.R., Martin, S.T. et al. (1995). Environmental Applications of Semiconductor Photocatalysis, 95 (1995) 6996.Google Scholar
[6] Nanzai, B., Okitsu, K., Takenaka, N., Bandow, H., Maeda, Y., Sonochemical degradation of various monocyclic aromatic compounds. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 15 (2010) 12351242.Google Scholar
[7] Paredes, S.P., Fetter, G., Bosch, P., Bulbulian, S., Sol-Gel Synthesis of Hidrotralcite-Like Compounds. J. Mater. Sci., 41 (2006) 33773384.Google Scholar
[8] Nava, G., Pacheco, G., Fetter, G., Bosch, P., Bulbulian, S., J. of Radioanal. And Nucl. Chem., 263 (1996) 207218.Google Scholar