Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:15:17.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparative Study of Quasi-solid Nanoclay Based Electrolyte and Liquid Electrolyte Dye Sensitized Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2013

Laura Main
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Department of Engineering, 6075 S. Williams Campus Loop, Mesa, AZ 85212, U.S.A.
Lakshmi Munukutla
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Department of Engineering, 6075 S. Williams Campus Loop, Mesa, AZ 85212, U.S.A.
Brian Fauss
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Department of Engineering, 6075 S. Williams Campus Loop, Mesa, AZ 85212, U.S.A.
Travis Curtis
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Department of Engineering, 6075 S. Williams Campus Loop, Mesa, AZ 85212, U.S.A.
Arunachalanadar M. Kannan
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Department of Engineering, 6075 S. Williams Campus Loop, Mesa, AZ 85212, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are currently being explored as a cheaper alternative to the more common silicon (Si) solar cell technology with improved performance in low light conditions and less sensitivity to varying angles of incident light. One of the major challenges facing DSSCs is loss of the liquid electrolyte, through evaporation or leakage, which lowers stability and leads to increased degradation. To address this, batches of gel electrolyte cells are fabricated with 7 wt% nanoclay gel electrolyte and liquid electrolyte and were evaluated at standard test conditions over time. The gel cells achieved efficiencies as high as 9.18% compared to the 9.65% achieved by the liquid cells. Over a period of 10 days, the liquid cells degraded less than 20% of its maximum efficiency. By contrast, the gel cell's efficiency did not decrease to 20% of its maximum efficiency until 45 days. After several measurements, the liquid cells showed visible signs of leakage through the sealant, whereas the gel cells did not. This resistance to leakage likely contributed to the improved performance of the quasi-solid cells over liquid electrolyte DSSCs.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

O'Regan, B., and Grätzel, M., “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dyesensitized colloidal TiO2 films”, Nature, vol. 353, pp. 737740, Oct 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yella, A. et al. ., “Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells with cobalt (II/III)–Based redox electrolyte exceed 12 percent efficiency”, Science, vol. 334, pp. 629634, Nov 2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed