Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T06:14:45.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative Structural Study and Dissolution of Simplified Glasses: A Radioactive Waste Glass (R7T7) and a Basaltic Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

F. Angeli
Affiliation:
Service de Chimie Moléculaire, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France
P. Faucon
Affiliation:
Service de Chimie Moléculaire, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France
T. Charpentier
Affiliation:
Service de Physique de l'Etat Condensé, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France
J.C. Petit
Affiliation:
Service de Chimie Moléculaire, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France
J. Virlet
Affiliation:
Service de Chimie Moléculaire, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France
Get access

Abstract

The local cation environments in a borosilicate glass (containing the main components of the French nuclear waste glass, R7T7) and of basaltic-like glass are presented on the basis of 17A1 and 23Na Multi-Quanta Magic-Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (MQ-MAS NMR) spectroscopies. The chemical and geometrical environment of each nucleus is characterized. Moreover, qualitative information about the distribution of these parameters, characteristic of the disorder level in the structure, is obtained. These results are presented with the characteristics of the Al and Na dissolution in water at 100°C. The relation between the local environments of these cations and their mass loss in solution is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Ewing, R.C., 1979. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1, p. 5768.Google Scholar
2 Ewing, R.C. and Jercinovic, M.J., 1987. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 84, p. 6783.Google Scholar
3 Petit, J.C., 1992. J. Geochem. Explo. 46, p. 133.Google Scholar
4 Mazer, J.J., 1994. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 333, p. 159165.Google Scholar
5 Malow, G., Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C., 1984. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 67, p. 305321.Google Scholar
6 Byers, C.D., Jercinovic, M.J., Ewing, R.C. and Keil, K., 1985. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 44, p. 583590.Google Scholar
7 Lutze, W., Malow, G., Ewing, R.C., Jercinovic, M.J. and Keil, K., 1985. Nature 314. p.252255.Google Scholar
8 Grambow, B., Jercinovic, M.J., Ewing, R.C. and Byers, C.D., 1986. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 50, p. 263272.Google Scholar
9 Bunker, B.C., Arnold, G.W., Day, D.E. and Bray, P.J., 1986. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 87, p.226253.Google Scholar
10 Bunker, B.C., 1994. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 179, p.300308.Google Scholar
11 Frenzke, D., Freude, D., Frohlich, T., Haase, J., 1984. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 111, 171.Google Scholar
12 Frydman, L. and Harwood, J.S., 1995. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, p.5367.Google Scholar
13 Trotignon, L., 1990. Ph.D. Thesis, Toulouse. France.Google Scholar
14 Samoson, A., Sun, B.Q., Pines, A., 1992. Pulsed Magnetic Resonance: NMR, ESR, and Optics, eds Bagguley, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
15 Amoureux, J.P., Fernandez, C., Steuernagel, S., 1996. J. Magn. Reson. 123, p. 116.Google Scholar
16 Massiot, D., 1996. J. Magn. Reson. 122, p. 240.Google Scholar
17 Massiot, D., Touzo, B, Trumeau, D., Coutures, J.P., Virlet, J., Florian, J.P. and Grandinetti, P., 1996. J. Sol. Stat. Nucl. Magn. Reson. 6, p. 73.Google Scholar
18 Terki, A., Pacaud, F., Jacquet-Francillon, N. and Morlevat, J.P., 1985, Suitability for final disposal. Juelich (Germany, FR).Google Scholar
19 Nogues, J.L., 1984. Ph.D. Thesis, Montpellier. France.Google Scholar
20 Thomassin, J.H., 1984, Ph. D. Thesis, Orléans, France.Google Scholar
21 Doremus, R.H., 1975. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 19, p. 137144.Google Scholar
22 Bunker, B.C., Arnold, G.W., Beauchamp, E.K. and Day, D.E., 1983. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 58, p. 295322.Google Scholar