Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:32:14.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative Photoluminescence Measurement and Simulation of Vertical-Cavity Semiconductor Laser Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

D.T. Schaafsma
Affiliation:
Also of Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
D.H. Christensen
Affiliation:
Also of Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
R.K. Hickernell
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80303.
J.G. Pellegrino
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
Get access

Abstract

We present comparisons of photoluminescence (PL) data for various vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) and distributed quantum well structures taken with the pump beam (and the collection path) in two different configurations: normal to the surface of the sample; and perpendicular to a cross-section of the epitaxial layers. We demonstrate that the cross-sectional PL (XPL) technique can resolve individual features in the structures, and that the surface-normal PL (NPL) spectra are perturbed by the multilayer mirrors in the VCSELs. We elucidate a potential method for transforming between the NPL spectra and the non-perturbed XPL spectra and evaluate the sensitivity of this method to various measurement as well as material parameters. This simulation technique is well-suited to wide parametric variations of the dispersion curves for the complex dielectric constant of the materials, the pump field distribution, and the depth profile of the gain medium.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Yamamoto, Y., Machida, S. and Björk, G., Opt. and Quant. Elec. 24, S215 (1992).Google Scholar
2 Bowden, CM. and Dowling, J.P., Phys. Rev. A 47, 1247 (1993).Google Scholar
3 Lei, C., Huang, Z., Deppe, D.G., Pinzone, C.J. and Dupuis, R.D., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 2700 (1993).Google Scholar
4 Sanchez-Mondragon, J.J., Narozhny, N.B. and Eberly, J.H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 550 (1983).Google Scholar
5 Drexhage, K.H., in Progress tn Optics, edited by Wolf, E. (North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, 1974), vol. 12, p. 165.Google Scholar
6 Christensen, D.H., Pellegrino, J.G., Crochiere, S.M., Parsons, C.A., and Rai, R.S., J. Appl. Phys. 72, 5982 (1992).Google Scholar
7 Christensen, D.H., Parsons, C.A., Pellegrino, J.G., Hill, J.R., Rai, R.S., Crochiere, S.M., Hickernell, R.K., and Schaafsma, D.T., in Laser Diode Technology and Applications V (Proc. SPIE 1850, Bellingham, WA, 1993), p. 115.Google Scholar
8 Some work on extracting complex refractive index information from RS simulations has been done by Hickernell, R.K., Christensen, D.H., Wang, J. and Leburton, J.P., in OSA Annual Meeting Technical Digest, 1993 (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC, 1993), Vol. 16, p. 54.Google Scholar
9 Fresnel reflection for a single coherent emitter between two parallel interfaces; after the method of reference 3 or as given by Born, M. and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980), ch.7.Google Scholar