Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:26:29.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical Migration by Contact Metamorphism between Pegmatite and Country Rocks: Natural Analogs for Radionuclide Migration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

J. C. Laul
Affiliation:
Radiological Sciences DepartmentPacific Northwest LaboratoryRichland, Washington 99352
R. J. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space SciencesState University of New York, Stonybrook, New York 11794
C. K. Shearer
Affiliation:
Institute of Mineral DepositsSouth Dakota School of Mines, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701
J. J. Papike
Affiliation:
Institute of Mineral DepositsSouth Dakota School of Mines, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701
S. B. Simon
Affiliation:
Institute of Mineral DepositsSouth Dakota School of Mines, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701
Get access

Abstract

Comparison of trace element signatures of country rocks as a function of distance from the contact with two pegmatites, Tin Mountain and Etta, in the Black Hills of South Dakota, suggests that some elements such as K, Li, Rb, Cs, As, Sb, Zn and Pb, have migrated to distances of 4 to 40 meters during contact metamorphism. The relative degree of migration varies depending on the element. On the other hand, there is virtually no migration of rare earth elements (REE), Al, Sc, Cr, Hf, U, and Th. Biotite and muscovite are effective trace element traps for Li, Rb and Cs. Biotite has a greater affinity for Rb, Cs and Li than muscovite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Weimer, W. C., Kutt, J. C., and Laul, J. C., “Prediction of the ultimate biological availability of transuranic elements in the environment,” in “Contaminants and Sediments, 2, (Baker, R. A., Ed.), , Ann Arbor Science Publisher 465483, (1980).Google Scholar
[2] Nielson, K. K., “Matrix correctinos for energy dispersive x-ray fluorescence analysis of environmental samples with coherent/incoherent scattered x-rays,” Analytical Chemistry, 49, 641648, (1977).Google Scholar
[3] Nielson, K. K. and Sanders, R. W., “Multielement analysis of unweighed biological and geological samples using backscatter and fundamental parameters,” Advances in X-ray Analysis, (Plenum Pub. Co.) 26, 385390, (1983).Google Scholar
[4] Laul, J. C., “Neutron activation of geological materials,” Review article, Atomic Energy Review IAEA, 17, 603695, (1979).Google Scholar
[5] Laul, J. C. and Papike, J. J., “Chemical migration by contact metamorphism between granite and silt/carbonate system,” Proceedings of the International Long-Lived Radionuclideds from the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, IAEA-SM-257, 603612, (1982).Google Scholar
[6] Papike, J. J., Shearer, C. K., Simon, S. B., and Laul, J. C., “Pegmatite/Wallrock interactions: The Etta pegmatite, Black Hills, South Dakota,” G.S.A. Meeting, Salt Lake City, Utah, p. 436, (1983).Google Scholar
[7] Papike, J. J., Shearer, C. K., Simon, S. B., Laul, J. C. and Walker, R. J., “Pegmatite/Wallrock interactions, Black Hills, South Dakota: Natural Analogs for radionuclide migration,” EθS, 64, p. 351, (1983).Google Scholar
[8] Papike, J. J., Shearer, C. K., Simon, S. B., and Laul, J. C., “Fluid flow through crystalline rocks: Sheet silicates as trace element traps,” G.S.A. Fall Meeting Indianapolis, Indiana, (1983).Google Scholar
[9] Papike, J. J., Shearer, C. K., Simon, S. B., and Laul, J. C., “Crystal chemical aspects of Li, Rb, and Cs partitioning between coexisting muscovite and biotite,” Abstracts for the 27th I.G.C., Moscow, in press, (1984).Google Scholar