Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:21:29.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical Effects in Ion Implantation Induced Quantum Well Intermixing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Todd W. Simpson
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario, Department of Physics & Astronomy, London, ON, N6A 3K7, CANADA
Paul G. Piva
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario, Department of Physics & Astronomy, London, ON, N6A 3K7, CANADA
Ian V. Mitchell
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario, Department of Physics & Astronomy, London, ON, N6A 3K7, CANADA
Get access

Abstract

Ion implantation followed by rapid thermal annealing is used to induce layer intermixing and thus selectively blue-shift the emission wavelength of InP-based quantum well hetero- structures. The intermixing is greatly enhanced over thermal intermixing due to the supersaturation of defects. The magnitude of the observed blue-shift has been studied previously as a function of ion fluence and ion mass: the dependence on ion mass is well established, with heavier ions producing a larger shift. We show here that chemical effects can also play a significant role in determining the induced blue-shift. Data are presented from the implantation of the similar mass ions; aluminum (m~27), silicon (m~28) and phosphorus (m~31). The P- induced blue shift displays a monotonic increase with fluence, consistent with previous studies; however, the fluence dependence of Al- and Si-induced blue-shifts both deviate significantly from the behaviour for P. These results have important implications for attempts to scale intermixing behaviour with ion mass.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.For a recent overview of quantum well intermixing, see “Quantum Well Intermixing for Photonics,” Edited by Li, E. Herbert, Proc. SPIE, MS–145, (1998).Google Scholar
2.Tan, H.H., Williams, J.S., Jagadish, C., Burke, P.T. and Gal, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 396, 823 (1996).Google Scholar
3.Haysom, J. E., Aers, G. C., Raymond, S., and Poole, P. J., J. Appl. Phys. 88, 3090 (2000).Google Scholar
4.Biersack, J. P. and Haggmark, L. G., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 174, 257 (1980).Google Scholar
5.Gasparotto, A., Carnera, A., Frigeri, C., Priolo, F., Fraboni, B., Camporese, A. and Rossetto, G., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 753 (1999).Google Scholar
6.Simpson, T.W., Piva, P.G. and Mitchell, I.V., unpublished.Google Scholar
7.Simpson, T.W. and Mitchell, I.V., Appl. Phys. Lett., 78, 207 (2001)Google Scholar