Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:21:26.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterizing The Distribution Of Space Charge In Poled Polymer Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Kenneth S. Haber
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry; School of Chemical Engineering; Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Mark H. Ostrowski
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering; Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Matthew J. O'Sickey
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering; Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Hilary S. Lackritz
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering; Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Get access

Extract

Much effort has been put into improving the temporal stability of electric field-induced chromophore alignment in molecularly doped or functionalized polymers for second order nonlinear optical device applications. Characterization of the alignment decay in electric field-poled films is complicated by charge injection during poling. In order to optimize poling schemes and to accurately determine the orientational mobility of the chromophores it is necessary to develop methods to measure the spatial extent and time-dependence of any residual fields in the polymer films. Such Measurements will also be important for the development of polymer-based electro-optic devices, and in fact for any guided wave application in these materials since the residual field may induce a spatial dependence in the refractive index.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Melnyk, A.R. and Pai, D.M., in Physical Methods of Chemistry. Vol. VIII: Determination of Electronic and Optical Properties, edited by Rossiter, B.W. and Baetzold, R.C. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1993) p. 321.Google Scholar
2. Carr, S.H., in Electrical Properties of Polymers, edited by Seanor, D. A. (Academic Press, New York, 1982), p. 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Simmons, J.G. and Tarn, M.C., Phys. Rev. B 7, 3706 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. De Reggi, A.S., Guttman, C.M., Mopsik, F.I., Davis, G.T., and Broadhurst, M.G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 413 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hutchins, D.A. and Tam, A.C., IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Contr. UFFC- 33, 429 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Simmons, J.G., Nadkarni, G.S., and Lancaster, M.C., J. Appl. Phys. 41, 538 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Wu, X.Z., Kitamori, T., Teramae, N., and Sawada, T., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 64, 755 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Cohen, L.B., Salzberg, B.M., Davila, H.V., Ross, W.N., and Landowne, D., J. Memb. Biol. 19, 1 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Page, R.H., Jurich, M.C., Reck, B., Sen, A., Twieg, R.J., Swalen, J.D., Bjorklund, G.C., and Wilson, C.G., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7, 1239 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Scott, T.W. and Albrecht, A.C., J. Chem. Phys. 70, 3657 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Reich, U.R. and Schmidt, S., Ber. Bunsenges. Physik. Chem. 76, 589 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar