Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:31:49.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of the Activation-Relaxation Technique: Recent Results on Models of Amorphous Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Rachid Malek ,
Normand Mousseau  and
G. T. Barkema
Rachid Malek
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy and CMSS, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA.
Normand Mousseau
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy and CMSS, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA.
G. T. Barkema
Affiliation:
Theoretical Physics, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, The, Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

The activation-relaxation technique (ART) is a method for finding saddle points in high-dimen- sional energy landscapes. ART has already been applied to a wide range of materials including amorphous semiconductors, Lennard-Jones glasses, and proteins. In spite of its successes, a number of fundamental questions remain to be answered regarding the biases associated with its sampling of the saddle points. We present here results of a detailed analysis of the biases in the simulation of amorphous silicon. We focus in particular on the biases of the method in sampling saddle points, the completeness of the sampling and the sensitivity of these quantities to variations of the different parameters.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 677: Symposium AA – Advances in Materials Theory and Modeling–Bridging Over Multiple-Length and Time Scales , 2001 , AA8.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Voter, A. F., Phys.Rev.Lett. 78, 3908 (1997).Google Scholar
[2] Voter, A. F., Phys.Rev.B 57, R13985 (1998).Google Scholar
[3] Sorensen, M. R., Voter, A. F., J. Chem. Phys. 112, 9599 (2000).Google Scholar
[4] Barkema, G. T. and Mousseau, N., Phys.Rev.Lett. 77, 4358 (1996).Google Scholar
[5] Doye, J. P. K. and Wales, D. J., Z. Phy.D 40, 466 (1997).Google Scholar
[6] Henkelman, G. and Jónsson, H., J. Chem. Phys. 111, 7010 (1999).Google Scholar
[7] Song, Y., Malek, R. and Mousseau, N., Phys. Rev. B 62, 15680 (2000).Google Scholar
[8] Barkema, G. T. and Mousseau, N.,Phys.Rev.B 62, 4985 (2000).Google Scholar
[9] Vink, R. L. C., Barkema, G. T., Weg, W. F. van der and Mousseau, N., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 282, 248 (2001).Google Scholar
[10] Malek, R. and Mousseau, N., Phys. Rev. E 62, 7723 (2000).Google Scholar
[11] Mousseau, N. and Barkema, G. T., Phys. Rev. E 57, 2419 (1998).Google Scholar
[12] Cerjan, C. J. and Miller, W. H., J. Chem. Phys. 75, 2800 (1981).Google Scholar
[13] Mousseau, N. and Barkema, G. T., Comp. Sci. Eng. 1, 74 (March/April 1999).Google Scholar