Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:58:00.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Stress and Mosaicity in Homoepitaxial Diamond Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

W. Brock Alexander
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Paul H. Holloway
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Patrick Doering
Affiliation:
LMA, Inc. 93 West Tech Center, Medfield, MA 02052
Robert Linares
Affiliation:
LMA, Inc. 93 West Tech Center, Medfield, MA 02052
Get access

Abstract

Diamond films were grown on (100) and (110) oriented natural diamond substrates by hot filament assisted chemical vapor deposition (HFCVD) to thicknesses of 7 to 100μm. Raman spectroscopy was used to measure tensile stresses of up to ∼2GPa for some of the (110) films. The development of stress was attributed to the incorporation of impurities (Re, Mo, and H). Impurity concentrations were greater at the interface than through the film thickness. Up to∼11% H and 50ppm Re were measured in the films with secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). Homoepitaxial diamond films were further characterized using a seven crystal high resolution x-ray diffraction system. This new characterization tool allowed the separation of the effects of mosaicity from those of variation in lattice parameter.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Schemrmer, J.J., van Enckevort, W.J.P., and Giling, L.J., Diamond and Related Materials, 3, 408 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Alexander, W. Brock, Characterization of Homoepitaxial Diamond Thin Films Grown By Hot Filament Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition, Ph.Dissertation, D., University of Florida, May (1995).Google Scholar
3. Boppart, H., van Straaten, J., and Silvera, Isaac F., Phys Review B 32, 14231425 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Grimsditch, M. H., Anastassakis, E., and Cardona, M., Phys. Rev. B 18, 901904 (1978).Google Scholar
5. Parsons, B.J., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 352, 397 (1977).Google Scholar
6. Sharma, S.K., Mao, H.K., Bell, P.M., and Xu, J.A., Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 16, 350 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Tardieu, A., Cansell, F., and Petitet, J.P., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 3243 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Whalley, E., Lavergne, A., and Wong, P.T.T., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 47, 845 (1976).Google Scholar
9. Cullity, B.D., Elements of X-ray Diffraction (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Inc., Reading, MA, 1978).Google Scholar
10. Fewster, P.F., Appl. Surf. Sci. 50, 9 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Alexander, W.B., Holloway, P.H., Simmons, J., and Ochoa, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 12, 2943 (1994).Google Scholar
12. Chu, J., D'Evelyn, M.P., Hauge, R.H., and Margrave, J.L., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 1695 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Gonzalez-Hemandez, J., Azarbayejani, G.H., Tsu, R., and Pollack, F.H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 1350 (1985).Google Scholar
14. Campbell, I.H. and Fauchet, P.M., Mater. Res. Symp. Proc. Vol.53, 311 (1986).Google Scholar
15. Fauchet, P.M., Campbell, I.H., and Adar, F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 479 (1985).Google Scholar
16. Tsu, R., Gonzalez-Hemandez, J., Chao, S.S., Lee, S.C., and Tanaka, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 40, 534 (1982).Google Scholar
17. Tsu, R., Gonzalez-Hernandez, J., Doehler, J., and Ovshinsky, S.R., Solid State Comm. 46, 79 (1983).Google Scholar
18. Campbell, I.H. and Fauchet, P.M., Solid State Comm. 58, 739 (1986).Google Scholar
19. Richter, H. and Ley, L., J. Phys. 42, C4 (1981).Google Scholar
20. Davis, Robert F., Eds., Diamonds Films and Coatings (Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, N.J., (1993).Google Scholar