Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:56:38.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of MBE Grown GaAs With Isoelectronic Doping of Indium or Antimony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

A.Z. Li
Affiliation:
Shanghai Institute of Metallurgy, Academia Sinica, Shanghai, China, 200050
H.K. Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA 15213
J. Jeong
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA 15213
J. Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA 15213
T.E. Schlesinger
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA 15213
A.G. Milnes
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA 15213
Get access

Abstract

The effects of In and Sb on the concentration of electron traps in MBE grown n-type GaAs are investigated. Two traps, labeled M3 and M6, dominate the DLTS spectrum. It is observed that at growth temperatures of 500 and 550° C their concentrations can be reduced by up to two orders of magnitude by the introduction of a few atomic percent of either In or Sb. The percent In or Sb producing the lowest trap concentrations decreases with increasing substrate temperature and thus for a substrate growth temperature of 600° C no additional improvement in the deep trap concentration is observed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Lang, D.V., Cho, A.Y., Gossard, A.C., Ilegems, M., and Weigmann, W., J. Appl. Phys. 46, 2558(1976).Google Scholar
2.Blood, P. and Harris, J.J., J. Appl. Phys. 56, 993(1984).Google Scholar
3.Skromme, B.J., Bose, S.S., Lee, B., Low, T.S., Lepkowski, T.R., DeJule, R.Y., Stillman, G.E., and Hwang, J.C.M., J. Appl. Phys. 58, 4685(1985).Google Scholar
4.DeJule, R.Y., Haase, M.A., Stillman, G.E., Palmateer, S.C., and Hwang, J.C.M., J. Appl. Phys. 57, 5287(1985).Google Scholar
5.Xu, H.D., Anderson, T.G., and Westin, J.M., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 2136(1987).Google Scholar
6.Hobgood, H.M., Thomas, R.N., Barrett, D.L., Elridge, G.W., Sopira, M.M., and Driver, M.C., in Proceedings of the International Conference on Semi-Insulating II-V Materials, p. 149; Duseaux, M. and Martin, S., in Proceedings of the International Conference on Semi-Insulating III-V Materials, p. 111; Kah-nee-ta, 1984, edited by Look, D. C. and J. S. Blakemore (Shiva, England, 1984).Google Scholar
7.Winston, H.V., Hunter, A.T., Olsen, H.M., Bryan, R.P., and Lee, R.E., presented at the Conf. Semi-Inaul. III-V Mater. 3rd, Warm Springs, OR, April 1984.Google Scholar
8. Solov'eva, E.V., Rytova, N.S., Mil'vidskii, M.G., and Ganina, N.V., Soy. Phys. Semicond. 15, 1243(1981).Google Scholar
9.Rytova, N.S., Solov'eva, E.V., and Mil'vidskii, M.G., Soy. Phys Semicond. 16, 951(1982).Google Scholar
10.Beneking, H., Narozny, P., and Emeis, E., Appl. Phys. Lett., 47, 828 (1985).Google Scholar
11.Bhattacharya, Pallab K., Dhar, Sunanda, Berger, Paul, and Juang, Feng-Yuh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 470(1986).Google Scholar
12.Missous, M., Singer, K.E., and Nicholas, D.J., J. Crystal Growth 81, 314(1987).Google Scholar
13.Ehrenreich, H. and Hirth, J. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 46, 668 (1985).Google Scholar