Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:29:30.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Lead Zirconate Titanate Powders Prepared by a Hydrothermal Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Lingjuan Che
Affiliation:
[email protected], Shanghai University, School of Materials Science and Engineering, China, People's Republic of
Yongping Ding
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Minnesota, Electrical and Computer Engr, United States
Jinrong Cheng
Affiliation:
[email protected], Shanghai University, School of Materials Science and Engineering, China, People's Republic of
Chao Chen
Affiliation:
[email protected], Shanghai University, School of Materials Science and Engineering, China, People's Republic of
Zhongyan Meng
Affiliation:
[email protected], Shanghai University, School of Materials Science and Engineering, China, People's Republic of
Get access

Abstract

Lead Zirconate Titanate (PZT) powders have been synthesized by a hydrothermal method at the processing temperatures of 120-220 °C for 1.5-50 hours, based on the reaction of Pb(CH3COOH)2·3H2O, ZrOCl2·8H2O, Ti(C4H9O)4 and KOH. Hydrothermally treated PZT powders were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Fourier transformation infrared (FTIR) techniques respectively. The influences of hydrothermal synthesize conditions on the crystalline structure and the morphology of PZT particles were investigated. Crystallized PZT powders could be synthesized at the KOH concentration of >2.5 mol/l.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lee, B. W., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 24, 925 (2004).Google Scholar
2 Chakrabarty, N., Maity, H. S., Mater. Lett. 30, 169 (1997).Google Scholar
3 Zhang, M. S., Yu, J., Chu, J. H., Chen, Q., Chen, W. C., J. Mater. Processing Tech. 137, 78 (2003).Google Scholar
4 Choa, S. B., Noha, J. S., Lenckab, M. M., Rimanc, R. E., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 23, 2323 (2003).Google Scholar
5 Yang, Q. B., Li, Y. X., Yin, Q. R., Wang, P. L., Cheng, Y. B., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 23, 161 (2003).Google Scholar
6 Traianidis, M., Courtois, C., Leriche, A. and Thierry, B., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 19, 1023 (1999).Google Scholar
7 Su, B., Button, T. W., Ponton, C. B., J. Mater. Sci. 39, 6439 (2004).Google Scholar
8 Piticescu, R. M., Moisin, A. M., Taloi, D., Badilita, V., Soare, I., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 24, 931 (2004).Google Scholar
9 Riman, R. E., Suchanek, W. L., and Lencka, M. M., Ann. Chem. Sci. Mat. 27, 15 (2002).Google Scholar
10 Traianidis, M., Courtois, C. C., Leriche, A., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 20, 2713 (2000).Google Scholar
11 Moon, J., Kerchner, J. A., Krarup, H., and Adai, J. H., J. Mater. Res. 14, 425 (1999).Google Scholar
12 Lee, Y. J., Yen, F. S., J. Crys. Growth. 178, 335 (1997).Google Scholar