Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:52:09.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles Produced by A Carbon Arc

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

E. M. Brunsman
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213–3890
S. Anna
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213–3890
S. A. Majetich*
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213–3890
M. E. Mchenry
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213–3890
*
Correspondence Author
Get access

Abstract

The effect of increasing metal fraction on carbon arc nanoparticle production is examined for 10–50 weight percent cobalt starting materials. With 500 Torr of helium buffer gas, the carbon arc process yields carbon-coated FCC Co nanoparticles of similar sizes throughout this range. The saturation magnetization is believed to scale linearly with the relative abundance of Co. The variation in the coercivity with abundance is small compared to the dramatic changes which can arise from changes in the size of fine particles. The approach to magnetic saturation is more rapid in high abundance samples. This is attributed to interparticle interactions which align the easy axes when the nanoparticles crystallize within interconnected carbon shells. The switching field distribution as a function of Co abundance arises from both rotational barriers and from barriers due to the particle size distribution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kratschmer, W., Lamb, L. D., Fostiropoulos, K., and Huffman, D. R., Nature 347, 354 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Johnson, R. D., de, M. S. Vries, Salem, J., and Bethune, D. S., Nature 355, 239 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Iijima, S., Nature 354, 57 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Ruoff, R.S., Lorents, D.C., Chan, B., Malhotra, R., and Subramoney, S., Science 259, 346, (1993); M. Tomita, Y. Saito, and T. Hayashi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32, L280, (1993).Google Scholar
5. Majetich, S. A., Artman, J. O., McHenry, M. E., Nuhfer, N. T., and Staley, S. W., Phys. Rev. B 48, 16845, (1993).Google Scholar
6. McHenry, M. E., Majetich, S. A., Graef, M. De, Artman, J. O., and Staley, S. W., Phys. Rev. B 49, 11358 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Liou, S. H. and Chien, C. L., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 4240 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Majetich, S. A., Scott, J. H., Brunsman, E. M., and McHenry, M. E., Science and Technology of Fullerene Materials, Materials Research Society, Fall 1994, abstract G3.8.Google Scholar
9. Cullity, B. D., Introduction to Magnetic Materials, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1972.Google Scholar
10. Luborsky, F. E., J. Appl. Phys. 32, 171S (1961).Google Scholar