Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:11:03.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Energy Absorption of Two Armor Grade Composites Arrangements Base on Aramid and Polypropylene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2014

R.A. Gamboa
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., Mérida, Yucatán, México.
J.G. Carrillo*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., Mérida, Yucatán, México.
R.H. Rafful
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., Mérida, Yucatán, México.
B.J. Dzul
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Get access

Abstract

Ballistic grade composite materials have shown several advantages in comparison with their individual constituents, such as increased ballistic limit and reduced posterior trauma. One configuration in particular that has demonstrated greater ballistic efficiency is the arrangement of independent laminates (IL). It presents an increase in energy absorption compared to its counterpart of consolidated laminates (CL). In this study, an analysis is carried out to determine the effect on the ballistic performance of IL and CL arrangements when they are subjected to biaxial prestress (BP). Results show how the ballistic advantage obtained in IL is nullified in comparison with CL, thus demonstrating the limitations of this arrangement for possible applications where the arrangement is subjected to normal impacts with BP.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bryan, A. C. and Bogetti, T. A., Compos Struct. 61, 161 (2003).Google Scholar
Naik, N. K. and Doshi, A. V., AIAA Journal. 43, 1525 (2005); Compos Struct. 82, 447(2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naik, N.K. and Shrirao, P., Compos Struct. 66, 579 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, S.K., PhD, Thesis, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 2007.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J.G., Gamboa, R.A., Flores-Johnson, E.A. and Gonzalez-Chi, P.I, Polym Test, 31, 512 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J.G., Gamboa, R.A. and Cantwell, W.J., in Thermoplastic Elastomer, edited by El-Sonbati, A.Z. (InTech Publisher,Croatia, 2012) pp. 193212.Google Scholar
Welsh, L.M. and Harding, J., J. Phys-Paris, 8, 10 (1985).Google Scholar