Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:55:40.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of Defects in Proton-Implanted GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

H. A. Jenkinson ,
G. N. Maracas ,
M. O'Tooni  and
R. G. Sarkis
H. A. Jenkinson
Affiliation:
U. S. Army Armaments Research and Development Center, Dover, NJ07801-5001
G. N. Maracas
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Center for Solid State Electronics Research, Tempe, AZ 85287
M. O'Tooni
Affiliation:
U. S. Army Armaments Research and Development Center, Dover, NJ07801-5001
R. G. Sarkis
Affiliation:
U. S. Army Armaments Research and Development Center, Dover, NJ07801-5001
Get access

Abstract

Studies have been made of n+-GaAs implanted with 300 keV protons to fluences of 1014−1016/cm2. Electrical studies included I–V analysis, DLTS, and thermally stimulated current measurements made on implanted FET-like structures fabricated from MBE GaAs epi-layers. Optical infrared reflectance spectra and high resolution transmission electron micrographs were obtained for as-implanted material and for specimens annealed at 300 °C and 500 °C. Results show as-implanted material can be characterized by a band of traps lying about 0.2 eV below the conduction band with a relatively uniform distribution throughout the implanted region. Thermal processing causes a significant alteration in the density and distribution of these defects.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 35: Symposium A – Energy Beam-Solid Interactions and Transient Thermal Processing/1984 , 1984 , 299
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Speight, J.D., Leigh, P., McIntyre, N., Groves, I. G., and O'Hara, S., Electron. Lett. 10, 98–99, (1974).Google Scholar
2. Garmire, E., Stoll, H., Yarive, A., and Hunsperger, R. G., Appl. Phys. Lett., 21, 87–88, (1972).Google Scholar
3. Gibbons, J. F., Johnson, W. S., and Mylorie, S. W., Projected Range Statistics, 2nd Edition (Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA 1975).Google Scholar
4. Zavada, J. M., Sadana, D. K., Wilson, R., Sarkis, R. G., and Jenkinson, H. A., Proceedings of SPIE Conference 530 - Advanced Applications of Ion Implantation, Paper 530–26, Los Angeles (1985).Google Scholar
5. Maracas, G. N., Laidig, W. D., and Wittman, H. R., J. Vac. Sci. Tech., JVST-B2 July/Sept. #3, (1984).Google Scholar
6. Jenkinson, H. A. and Larson, D. C., NASA Conference Publication 2207, 231–240, Hampton, VA (1981).Google Scholar
7. Jenkinson, H. A., O'Tooni, M., Zavada, J. M., Haar, T. J., and Larson, D. C., Proceedings of the Fall Meeting of the Materials Research Society, Paper E7.22, Boston, MA (1983).Google Scholar
8. Lang, D. V., Logan, R. A., and Kimerling, L. C., Phys. Rev. B, 15, 4874–4882, (1977).Google Scholar