Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:04:59.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characteristic Comparison Between Ge-on-Insulator (GOI) and SI-on-Insulator (SOI) Beam-Induced Crystallization Mechanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

El-Hang Lee
Affiliation:
AT&T Laboratories, Engineering Research Center, P.O. Box 900, Princeton, NJ 08540 U.S.A.
M. Abdul Awal
Affiliation:
AT&T Laboratories, Engineering Research Center, P.O. Box 900, Princeton, NJ 08540 U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Characteristics of beam-recrystallized Si-on-insulator (SOT) and Ge-on-insulator (GOI) material systems are compared for the first time to gain complementary understanding of the crystallization mechanism that would benefit both systems. In general, GOI has been found to behave quite differently from SOI. In SOI, Si yields sub-boundaries; in GOI, Ge generates twinned or faceted crystals. In GOI, too, sub-boundary-like features were observed, but only occasionally in the midst of twinned crystals. Also observed in GOI was the phenomenon of seeded crystallization breakdown, where defect-free crystals from the seed abruptly turn into defect-laced crystals at a certain distance from the seed. This phenomenon is highly characteristic in SOI, but has never been reported for GOI. These findings are compared and discussed in light of the traditional understanding of crystal growth.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] See, for example, Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings (published by North Holland), Vols. 1, 4, 13, 35 (1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, respectively), SOI sections.Google Scholar
[2] Ohmachi, Y., Nishioka, T. and Shinoda, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 5466 (1983).Google Scholar
[3] Shinoda, Y., Nishioka, T. and Ohmachi, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 22, L450 (1983).Google Scholar
[4] The 2nd International Workshop on Future Electron Devices: SOI Technology and 3-D Integration, Shuzenji, Japan, March 19–21, 1985.Google Scholar
[5] Lee, E.H., in 2nd International Conference on VLSI Science and Technology/1984, edited by Bean, K.E. and Rozgonyi, G.A. (The Electrochemical Society, 1984), Vol.84–7, pp. 250266.Google Scholar
[6] Lee, E.H., Awal, M.A., Celler, G.K., Pfeiffer, L., West, K., and Sheng, T.T., Proceedings of the Northeast Regional Meeting of the Metallurgical Society and The Materials Research Society, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey, May 1–2, 1986.Google Scholar
[7] Lee, E.H. and Rozgonyi, G.A., J. Cryst. Growth, 70, 223 (1984).Google Scholar
[8] Lee, E.H., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 35, 563 (1984).Google Scholar
[9] Bolling, G.F. and Tiller, W.A., in Metallurgy of Elemental and Compound Semiconductors, edited by Grubel, R.O. (Interscience, New York, 1961) p. 9 7.Google Scholar
[10] Lee, E.H., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 263 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Tiller, W.A., Jackson, K.A., Rutter, J. W., and Chalmers, B., Acta Metallurgica, 1, 428 (1953).Google Scholar
[12] Pfeiffer, L., West, K.W., Paine, S., and Joy, D.C., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 35, 583 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Geis, M.W., Smith, H.I., Tsaur, B.Y., Fan, J.C.C., Silversmith, D.J. and Mountain, R.W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 129, 2812 (1982).Google Scholar
[14] Lee, E.H., Materials Letters, 3, 73 (1985).Google Scholar
[15] See, for example, (a) Woodruff, D.P., The Solid-Liquid Interface, Cambridge University Press, (1983) p.84; (b) R.A. Laudise, The Growth of Single Crystals, Prentice Hall (1970) pp. 104 –9, 216–7; (c) B. Chalmers, Principles of Solidification, John Wiley and Sons (1964) pp.150–168; (d) J.C. Brice, The Growth of Crystals from the Melt, North-Holland (1965) p.58.Google Scholar
[16] Bensahel, D. and Auvert, G., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 13, 165 (1983).Google Scholar