Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:22:14.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cellulose Nanofibril (CNF) Reinforced Starch Insulating Foams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2014

N. Yildirim
Affiliation:
The Advanced Structures and Composites Center, University of Maine, 35 Flagstaff Road, Orono, ME, 04469-5793 T: (207) 581-2123, F: (207) 581-2074 School of Forest Resources, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME 04469-5755 T: (207) 581-2841, F: (207) 581-2875
S.M. Shaler
Affiliation:
The Advanced Structures and Composites Center, University of Maine, 35 Flagstaff Road, Orono, ME, 04469-5793 T: (207) 581-2123, F: (207) 581-2074 School of Forest Resources, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME 04469-5755 T: (207) 581-2841, F: (207) 581-2875
D.J. Gardner
Affiliation:
The Advanced Structures and Composites Center, University of Maine, 35 Flagstaff Road, Orono, ME, 04469-5793 T: (207) 581-2123, F: (207) 581-2074 School of Forest Resources, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME 04469-5755 T: (207) 581-2841, F: (207) 581-2875
R. Rice
Affiliation:
School of Forest Resources, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME 04469-5755 T: (207) 581-2841, F: (207) 581-2875
D.W. Bousfield
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Maine, 5737 Jenness Hall, Orono, ME 04469-5737 T: (207) 581-2277, F: (207) 581-2323
Get access

Abstract

In this study, biodegradable foams were produced using cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) and starch (S). The availability of high volumes of CNFs at lower costs is rapidly progressing with advances in pilot-scale and commercial facilities. The foams were produced using a freeze-drying process with CNF/S water suspensions ranging from 1 to 7.5 wt. % solids content. Microscopic evaluation showed that the foams have a microcellular structure and that the foam walls are covered with CNF`s. The CNF's had diameters ranging from 30 nm to 100 nm. Pore sizes within the foam walls ranged from 20 nm to 100 nm. The materials` densities ranging from 0.012 to 0.082 g/cm3 with corresponding porosities between 93.46% and 99.10%. Thermal conductivity ranged from 0.041 to 0.054 W/m-K. The mechanical performance of the foams produced from the starch control was extremely low and the material was very friable. The addition of CNF's to starch was required to produce foams, which exhibited structural integrity. The mechanical properties of materials were positively correlated with solids content and CNF/S ratios. The mechanical and thermal properties for the foams produced in this study appear promising for applications such as insulation and packaging.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Moon, Robert J.; Martini, Ashlie, Nairn, John, Simonsen, John and Youngblood, Jeff. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 40, 39413944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, Ivo M.G.; Magina, Sandra P., Oliveira, Lúcia, Freire, Carmen S.R., Silvestre, Armando J.D., Neto, Carlos Pascoal, Gandini, Alessandro. Composite Science and Technology, 2009, 69, 21632168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shogren, R. L.; Lawton, J. W., Doane, W. M. and Tiefenbacher, K. F.. Polymer, 1998, 39, 66496655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Gregory M.; Imam, Syed H., and Orts, William J.. MRS Bulletin, 2011, 36, 696702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufresne, Alain and Vignon, Michel R.. Macromolecules, 1998, 31, 2963–2696Google Scholar
Glenn, Gregory M. and Irving, Delilah W.. Carbohydrates, 1995, 72(2), 155161 Google Scholar
Tatarka, P. D., Cunningham, R. L.. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1996, 67, 11571176 3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., Gordon, S. H., and Imam, S.H.. Biomacromolecules, 2004, 5, 238244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabar, Yogaraj; Marie Raquez, Jean, Dubois, Philippe, and Narayan, Ramani. Biomacromolecules, 2005, 6, 807817 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatnagar, S. and Hanna, Milford A.. Cereal Chem. 1996, 73(5), 601604 Google Scholar
Svagan, Anna. J., Berglund, Lars A., and Jensen, Poul. Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2011, 3, 14111417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shogren, R. L.; Lawton, J. W., Tiefenbacher, K. F.. Industrial Crops and Products, 2002, 16, 6979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willett, J. L., Shogren, R. L.. Polymer, 2002, 43, 59355947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curvelo, S.; de Carvalho, A. J. F., Agnelli, J. A. M.. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2001, 45, 183188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Lorna J. and Ashby, Michael F., Cellular Solids; Structure & Properties, 1998, p. 11 Google Scholar
Shey, J., Imam, S.H.; Glenn, G.M., Orts, W.J.. Industrial crops and products, 2006, 24, 3440 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gypsum Assosiation. Gypsum board typical mechanical and physical properties (GA-235-10) 2010 www.gypsum.org Google Scholar
Wang, Xinying; Zhong, Jiming, Wang, Yimin and Yu, Mingfang. Carbon, 2006, 44, 15601564 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohammed Ali, Zubaidah and Gibson, Lorna J.. Soft Matter, 2013, 9, 15801588 Google Scholar
Sehaqui, Houssine; Zhou, Qi, Berglund, Lars A.. Composites Science and Technology, 2011, 71, 15931599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, Chang-Qing; Han, Jie-Cai, Zhang, Xing-Hong and Du, Jian-Cong. Scripta Materialia, 2013, 68, 599602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahlia, T.M.I; Taufiq, B.N., Ismail, , Masjuki, H.H.. Energy and Buildings, 2007, 39, 182187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, Chuan-Liang and Heldman, Dennis R.. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2004, 39, 737743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Gregory M. and Irving, Delilah W.. Cereal Chem. 1995, 72(2), 155161 Google Scholar
Petersson, L.; Kvien, I., Oksman, K.. Composites Science and Technology, 2007, 67, 25352544 CrossRefGoogle Scholar