Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:20:13.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

C-Axis Resistivity of SbCl5-Graphite in Hopg and Single Crystal Forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

C. Uher  and
D.T. Morelli
C. Uher
Affiliation:
Physics Department, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
D.T. Morelli
Affiliation:
Physics Department, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Get access

Abstract

C-axis electrical resistivities were measured from 2-300K on SbCl5-graphite intercalation compounds, using both HOPG and single crystals as host materials. The resistivity of these compounds is up to an order of magnitude higher (˜10−2Ωm) than that of pure HOPG graphite. Yet, for stage n≤3 (in the case of HOPG), a metallic temperature dependence of ρC is observed throughout the entire investigated range. Higher stage compounds show metallic behavior at high temperatures, but exhibit a crossover to an activated dependence as the temperature is lowered. All samples show hysteretic behavior with cycling. A model, based on defect-mediated short-circuiting channels, is proposed to account for the existence of a metallic temperature dependence in conjunction with large resistivity.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 20: Symposium H – Intercalated Graphite , 1982 , 163
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dresselhaus, M.S. and Dresselhaus, G., Adv. in Phys. 30, 139 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Ubbelohde, A.R., Proc. Roy. Soc. A327, 289 (1972).Google Scholar
3. Clarke, R. and Homma, H., Bull. APS 26, 452 (1981).Google Scholar
4. Elzinga, M., Morelli, D.T. and Uher, C., Phys. Rev. B 26, 3312 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Clarke, R., Elzinga, M., Gray, J.N., Homma, H., Morelli, D.T. and Uher, C., Phys. Rev. B 26, 5250 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Spain, I.L. in Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, Walker, P.L. Jr. and Thrower, P.A., eds. (Marcel Dekker, New York) vol. 16, p. 143 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Morgan, G.J. and Uher, C., Phil. Mag. B44, 427 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Mott, N.F., Phil. Mag. 26, 1015 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hardcastle, S.E., Misenheimer, M.E. and Zabel, H., Bull. APS 27, 2721 (1982).Google Scholar
10. Daumas, N. and Hérold, A., Acad., C.R. Sci. 268, 373 (1969).Google Scholar
11. Fischer, J.E., Physica 99B, 383 (1980).Google Scholar
12. Anderson, P.W., Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958).Google Scholar
13. Uher, C. and Sander, L.M., Phys. Rev. B, accepted for publication.Google Scholar