Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:59:39.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cavity Evolution During Tensile Creep of Si3N4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

William Luecke
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
S. M. Wiederhorn
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
B. J. Hockey
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
G. G. Long
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Get access

Abstract

We have characterized the evolution of cavities during tensile creep of a Y2O3-hot isostatically pressed Si3N4, using precision density measurements, small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The cavities are bimodally distributed in size. Lenticular, 200 nm-size cavities are common, and lie primarily on two-grain boundaries. Irregularly shaped 500-1000 nm-size cavities are rare and lie at multi-grain junctions, but comprise approximately half of the total volume fraction of cavities. Although the material shows a continuous decrease in strain rate with strain, the cavity volume fraction evolves linearly with strain. Cavities account for approximately 85% of the total strain at any point during creep.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ferber, M. K. and Jenkins, M. J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 2453 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Wiederhorn, S. M., Hockey, B. J., Cranmer, D. C., and Yeckley, R., submitted to J. Mater. Sci. (1991).Google Scholar
3. Kossowsky, R., Miller, D. G., and Diaz, E. S., J. Mater. Sci. 10, 983 (1975).Google Scholar
4. Evans, A. G. and Rana, A., Acta metall. 28, 129 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Wiederhorn, S. M., Hockey, B. J., and Chuang, T.-J., Creep and Creep Rupture of Structural Ceramics, in Toughening Mechanisms in Quasi-Brittle Materials, edited by Shah, S. P., pages 555576, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.Google Scholar
6. Carroll, Daniel F. and Wiederhorn, Sheldon M. and Roberts, D. E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 1610 (1989).Google Scholar
7. “Standard Test Method for Density of Glass by the Sink-Float Comparator”, Technical Report c729-75, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1990.Google Scholar
8. Monkman, F. C. and Grant, N. J., Proc. ASTM 56, 593 (1956).Google Scholar
9. Cranmer, D. C., Hockey, B. J., Wiederhorn, S. M., and Yeckley, R., to be published in Ceramic Engineering and Science Preceedings (1991).Google Scholar
10. Long, G. G. et al. , J. Appl. Cryst. 23, 535 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Potton, J. A., Daniell, G. J., and Melville, D., J. Appl. Cryst. 21, 663 (1988).Google Scholar