Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:42:45.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cationic Corrosion Inhibitors for Alkaliborosilicate Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

H.U. Zwicky
Affiliation:
Paul Scherrer Institute Würenlingen and Villigen, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
TH. Graber
Affiliation:
Paul Scherrer Institute Würenlingen and Villigen, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
R. Grauer
Affiliation:
Paul Scherrer Institute Würenlingen and Villigen, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
R. Restani
Affiliation:
Paul Scherrer Institute Würenlingen and Villigen, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

The dissolution behaviour of two alkali borosilicate glasses has been investigated at 90°C in the presence of potential corrosion inhibitors. The added materials were selected on the basis of surface chemistry considerations: Since the dissolution rate of silicate solid phases in alkaline solutions increases with growing negative surface charge, it should be expected that sorbing cations reduce the reaction rates. Due to the formation of insoluble hydroxides and silicates and to the dominance of neutral or negatively charged hydroxo complexes in the pH range of interest, the selection of potential inhibitors is very restricted.

The precipitated hydroxides of Al, Zn, Cd and Pb were chosen as the solid phases. Compared with the experiments in pure water, glass dissolution is enhanced in presence of Al(OH)3 and Zn(OH)2. The concentration of the aqua ions is too low for an inhibiting effect. Sorption of silicic acid on the hydroxide accelerates the glass dissolution. Addition of PbO had a strong inhibiting effect in a 28 days experiment. At longer times an insoluble lead silicate is formed and thereby the glass dissolution rate is increased. Cd on the other hand is still effective as an inhibitor after 365 days.

Based on the present results, the possibility of using glass corrosion inhibitors in a repository is considered not to be worthwhile.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nagra NGB 85-05, p. 4–10 (1985)Google Scholar
2. Lorenz, K., Werkstoffe und Korrosion 7, 567 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Buckwalter, C.Q., Pederson, L.R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65, 431 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Stumm, W., Wollast, R., Reviews of Geophysics 2, 53 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Schott, J., in Aquatic Chemical Kinetics, edited by Stumm, W. (J. Wiley & Sons, 1990).Google Scholar
6. Baes, C.F., Mesmer, R.E., The Hydrolysis of Cations (R.E. Krieger, 1986).Google Scholar
7. Werme, L., Börner, I.K., Bart, G., Zwicky, H.U., Grambow, B., Lutze, W., Ewing, R.C., Magrabi, C., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1130 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Materials Characterization Center, Nuclear Waste Materials Handbook, Vol. 1, Test Methods, DOE/TIC- 11400, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington (1981).Google Scholar
9. Gmelins Handbuch der anorganischen Chemie, 8. Auflage, Blei Teil C Lieferung 2, System-Nummer 47, p. 692 (Verlag Chemie GmbH, Weinheim/Bergstr., 1969).Google Scholar
10. Zwicky, H.U., Grambow, B., Magrabi, C., Aerne, E.T., Bradley, R., Barnes, B., Graber, Th., Mohos, M., Werme, L.O., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 127, Pittsburgh, PA 1989), pp. 129136.Google Scholar
11. Hudson, G.A., Bacon, F.R., Ceramic Bulletin 34, 185 (1958).Google Scholar