Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T17:47:16.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carbon Nanofiber-Network Sensor Films for Strain Measurement in Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Nguyen Q Nguyen
Affiliation:
[email protected], Polytechnic Institute of New York University, Mechaical and Aerospace Engineering, Brooklyn, New York, United States
Sangyoon Lee
Affiliation:
[email protected], Polytechnic Institute of New York University, Mechaical and Aerospace Engineering, Brooklyn, New York, United States
Nikhil Gupta
Affiliation:
[email protected], Polytechnic Institute of New York University, Mechaical and Aerospace Engineering, Brooklyn, New York, United States
Get access

Abstract

A carbon nanofiber-based sensor film is designed and calibrated for force measurement. The sensor is designed for use in structural health monitoring of composite materials. The sensing scheme is based on creating a network of carbon nanofibers on the surface of the composite material. In the experimental scheme a patch of nanofiber reinforced epoxy resin film is developed and adhesively bonded to the laminate. The extension of the sensor film due to the applied force leads to a change in the connectivity of carbon nanofibers in the film, resulting in the change in the resistance of the network. Results show that such sensing schemes have high sensitivity and repeatability. Use of nanofibers can provide a low cost and more efficient alternative to other sensor films that rely on carbon nanotubes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Thostenson, E.T. and Chou, T.-W., Carbon Nanotube-Based health monitoring of mechanically fastened composite joints. Composites Science and Technology, 2008. 68(12): p. 25572561.Google Scholar
2. Thostenson, E.T., Ren, Z., and Chou, T.-W., Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Composites Science and Technology, 2001. 61(13): p. 18991912.Google Scholar
3. Li, C.Y., Thostenson, E.T., and Chou, T.W., Dominant role of tunneling resistance in the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube-based composites. Applied Physics Letters, 2007. 91(22): p. 223114.Google Scholar
4. Lu, X., et al., Carbon nanofiber-based composites for the construction of mediator-free biosensors. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2008. 23: p. 12361243.Google Scholar
5. Allaoui, A., Hoa, S.V., and Pugh, M.D., The electronic transport properties and microstructure of carbon nanofiber/epoxy composites. Composites Science and Technology, 2008. 68(2): p. 410416.Google Scholar
6. Kang, I., et al., Introduction to carbon nanotube and nanofiber smart materials. Composites: Part B, 2006. 37: p. 382–294.Google Scholar
7. Vaseashta, A. and Dimova-Malinovska, D., Nanostructured and nanoscale devices, sensors and detectors. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2005. 6: p. 312318.Google Scholar
8. Vamvakaki, V., Tsagaraki, K., and Chaniotakis, N., Carbon Nanofiber-Based Glucose Biosensor. Analytical Chemistry, 2006. 78(15): p. 55385542.Google Scholar
9. Baker, S.E., et al., Fabrication and characterization of vertically aligned carbon nanofiber electrodes for biosensing applications. Diamond and Related Materials, 2006. 15(2–3): p. 433439.Google Scholar
10. Higgins, B.A. and Brittain, W.J., Polycarbonate carbon nanofiber composites. European Polymer Journal, 2005. 41(5): p. 889893.Google Scholar
11. Zhou, Y., et al., Microstructure and resistivity of carbon nanotube and nanofiber/epoxy matrix nanocomposite. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2008. 198: p. 445453.Google Scholar
12. Yu, C., et al., Thermal contact resistance and thermal conductivity of a carbon nanofiber. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2006. 128: p. 234239.Google Scholar