Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:23:18.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brine Transport in the Bedded Salt of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (wipp): Field Measurements and a Darcy Flow Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

David F. Mctigue  and
E. James Nowak
David F. Mctigue
Affiliation:
Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer Div. I
E. James Nowak
Affiliation:
Experimental Programs Div., Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

Brine flow has been measured to unheated boreholes for periods of a few days and to heated holes for two years in the WIPP facility. It is proposed that Darcy flow may dominate the observed influx of brine. Exact solutions to a linearized model for one-dimensional, radial flow are evaluated for conditions approximating the field experiments. Flow rates of the correct order of magnitude are calculated for permeabilities in the range 10−21–1020 m2 (1–10 nanodarcy) for both the unheated and heated cases.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 112: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI , 1987 , 209
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Williams, M. L. and Sewards, T., 1987 (unpublished).Google Scholar
2. Roedder, E., Am. Mineral., 69, 413 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Molecke, M. A., Ruppen, J. A., and Diegle, R. B., Nucl. Tech., 63, 476 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Holcomb, D. J. and Shields, M. E., Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND87–1990, in press 1987.Google Scholar
5. Jenks, G. H. and Claiborne, H. C., Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report, ORNL-5815, 1981.Google Scholar
6. Pigford, T. H., Nucl. Tech., 56, 93 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Deal, D. E. and Case, J. B., IT Corporation Report, DOE-WIPP87–008, June 1987.Google Scholar
8. Stein, C. L. and Krumhansl, J. L., Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND85–0897, March 1986.Google Scholar
9. Nowak, E. J. and McTigue, D. F., Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND87–0880, May 1987.Google Scholar
10. Hadley, G. R., Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND81–0433, October 1981.Google Scholar
11. Molecke, M. A., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, edited by Jantzen, C. M., et al., (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1985), p. 265.Google Scholar
12. Nowak, E. J., Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND86–0720, May 1987.Google Scholar
13. Stormont, J. C., Peterson, E. W., and Lagus, P. L., Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND87–0176, May 1987.Google Scholar
14. Biot, M. A., J. Appl. Phys., 12, 155 (1941).Google Scholar
15. Rice, J. R. and Cleary, M. P., Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 14, 227 (1976).Google Scholar
16. McTigue, D. F., Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND85–1159, September 1985.Google Scholar
17. McTigue, D. F., J. Geophys. Res., 91, 9533 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Peterson, E. W., Lagus, P. L., and Lie, K., Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND87–7164, in review.Google Scholar
19. Crank, J., The Mathematics of Diffusion, (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1979), p.87 Google Scholar
20. Carslaw, H. S. and Jaeger, J. C., Conduction of Heat in Solids (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1959), p. 338.Google Scholar