Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:45:22.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bond Strength Of Deformed Bars and Steel Fibers in High Strength Concrete

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Methi Wecluat
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Civil Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J. 07102
Schboon Chimamphant
Affiliation:
Graduate Assistant, Department of Civil Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J. 07102
Get access

Abstract

In recent years, the means of making high strength concrete are simple by adding microsilica, fly ash, or other types of additives. As the use of high strength concrete increases, the need to clearly understand its prcperties is essentially a necessity for engineering design. While much of the basic properties of high strength concrete such as compressive strength (fc), modulus of elasticity (Ec), and modulus of rupture (fr), etc., has been investigated and reported recently, many remain unavailable. This paper presents the bond strength characteristics of deformed bar, steel fibers, and normal aggregate in high strength concrete matrix. The compressive strength of concrete used in this study is 75–80 MPa (11,000-12,000 psi). Bond slip relationships of deformed bars of three different bar diameters were obtained from the pull-cut test. Two types of steel fiber reinforced high strength cemented composites were tested in a directtension, tapered specimen to observe the pulled-out behavior of steel fibers. Fiber reinforced concretes with fiber volume fraction of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 % were compared to the unreinforced matrix. A direct-tension, dog boned specimen was used to study the bond between aggregate-matrix interface. The results from this study indicate that high strength concrete is generally more brittle, and in essence, allows less microcracking, less slippage, and less pulled-out deformation. This general trend is observed in both the deformed bar and fiber pulled-out as well as in aggregate-matrix interfacial debonding. The maximum slip of deformed bars in high strength concrete is about 0.15 mm.(0.006 in.) which is only one-tenth of that reported for normal concrete as 1.5 to 2.0 mm.(0.06–0.08 in.). A normalized pull-out stress-displacement relationship of high strength fiber reinforced concrete exhibits a unique behavior similar to those reported for normal fiber reinforced matrix.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bertero, V.V., Proc. of High Strength Concrete Workshop, Shah, S.P., Editor, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, Dec. 2–4, 1979, pp. 96–167Google Scholar
2. ACI Committee 363, “State-of-the-Art Report on High Strength Concrete’ ACI Journal, July-August 1984, pp. 364–411Google Scholar
3. Carrasquillo, R.L., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 42 Nov.1984, pp.151168 Google Scholar
4. Ahmad, S.H., and Shah, S.P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 42, pp.169181 Google Scholar
5. Swamy, R.N., ASTM, Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, CCAGDP, 8, No.1, Summer 1986, pp. 33–41Google Scholar
6. Martin, H., Proc. Inter. Conf. on Bond in Concrete, Paisley, Scotland, June 1982 pp. 289–299Google Scholar
7. Mirza, S.M., and Houde, J., ACI Journal, Jan. 1979, pp. 19–46Google Scholar
8. Edwards, A.D., and Yannopoulos, P.J., Aci, J., March 1970, pp. 405–420Google Scholar
9. Hawkins, N.M., Lin, I.J., and Jeang, F. L, Proc. Inter. Conf. on Bond in Concrete, Paisley, Scotland, June 1982, pp.151–161Google Scholar
10. Shih, T.S., Lee, G.C., and Chang, K.C., ASCE, Journal of Structural Engineering, 113 No.11, Nov.1987, pp. 22782289 Google Scholar
11. Wecharatana, M., and Shah, S.P., Cement and Concrete Research, 13, Nav, 1983, pp.819829 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Naaman, A.E., Mat. Res. Soc. ymp. Proc., Vol.42, 1985, pp.219229 Google Scholar
13. Visalvanich, K., and Naaman, A.E., ACI Journal, 80, No.2, 1983, pp. 128138 Google Scholar
14. Gopalaratnam, V.S., and Shah, S.P., ASCE, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 113, No.5, May 1987, pp.635652 Google Scholar
15. Wecharatana, M., and Chiou, W.J., Proc. 1986 SEM Spring Conf., June 1986, pp. 2330 Google Scholar
16. Cintora, T., MS. Thesis, New Jersey Inst. Tech., Newark, Dec.1987 Google Scholar